NikkiMontalvo said:Jacqueline Morris Jackson · Wheatley, Ontario
Ok parents and grandparents who have not contributed 1 cent to Canada should not be allowed. This is just abuse of our social services
Like · Reply · 4 mins
James Rogers · Works at Your Caledon
80 year old grandmother? Another drain blah
Like · Reply · 1 · 5 hrs
Carole Diane Gagne · Ecole Secondaire Franco Cité
I am also concerned re the health care drain...we can't even accomodate our own elderly at the moment; not good
Like · Reply · 8 mins
Patrick Lawson
Need to find out who's on the take. Could very well ruin this once great nation.
kh31017 said:I used same day delivery (before 9 ) and dropped my package at Brampton Purolator . Not sure if they delivered it themselves or used some other courier company .
emceemouli said:Their parents should be asked to leave the country
mamaburger said:"Abuse of our social services..." really? Like what? All of us have to sign an undertaking to pay for our parents for 20 years! Some people need to learn how to read all the facts before spurting out brainless comments. Oh well, like they say, empty vessels makes the most noise.
Rob_TO said:The 20 year undertaking is basically only for welfare. By "social services" the person is indicating tax-funded things like healthcare, GST/HST credits, etc.
In a way they are right, which is why the PGP program needs to have strict quotas. Our healthcare system is stretched as it is, so have to be careful when allowing in new PRs that are at the age where people start to use the most healthcare services.
Rob_TO said:The 20 year undertaking is basically only for welfare. By "social services" the person is indicating tax-funded things like healthcare, GST/HST credits, etc.
In a way they are right, which is why the PGP program needs to have strict quotas. Our healthcare system is stretched as it is, so have to be careful when allowing in new PRs that are at the age where people start to use the most healthcare services.
Seems like a lot of sponsors here have the mis-conception that by signing a 20 year bond, they are taking the 'entire' burden of their parents off of this country's tax payers. Two words for you - health care! I for one never forget that being able to bring my parents here is a privilege not a right! You can argue over the caps (conservative vs. liberal) but this privilege cannot be taken for granted! There are perceived benefits to this sponsorship program but citizens of this country by birth are entitled to their opinions as those that are voiced in the comments of that story. I'd like to see how many hands go up if the sponsorship program required that all or a percentage of healthcare costs be funded by the sponsors. That will separate those that genuinely want to reunite with their parents vs. those that have the convenience of health care in mind as one of the main reasons of their sponsorship.mamaburger said:"Abuse of our social services..." really? Like what? All of us have to sign an undertaking to pay for our parents for 20 years! Some people need to learn how to read all the facts before spurting out brainless comments. Oh well, like they say, empty vessels makes the most noise.
thecoolguysam said:True. But thinking on the other hand that our parents/grand parents need us during their old age. They have done their since we were born till we got independent and now it's our time to make sure that we take care of them during their old age. Basically, we are wanting our parents/grand parents to unite here in Canada so that we can take care of them during their old age.
Healthcare, and other tax-funded things are separate concerns.
thecoolguysam said:True. But thinking on the other hand that our parents/grand parents need us during their old age. They have done their since we were born till we got independent and now it's our time to make sure that we take care of them during their old age. Basically, we are wanting our parents/grand parents to unite here in Canada so that we can take care of them during their old age.
Healthcare, and other tax-funded things are separate concerns.
MissFrowz said:I totally agree with this. It's also easier for me to take care of my parents if they are here, rather than sending money home. That way my income stays within Canada, helping the economy at the same time. Also, my parents are in their early 50s, and plan on working into their 70s (hopefully they are able to find jobs), so I doubt they will be causing a drain on the system.
Rob_TO said:The 20 year undertaking is basically only for welfare. By "social services" the person is indicating tax-funded things like healthcare, GST/HST credits, etc.
In a way they are right, which is why the PGP program needs to have strict quotas. Our healthcare system is stretched as it is, so have to be careful when allowing in new PRs that are at the age where people start to use the most healthcare services.
Quoi said:So only one Purolator application got CCed so far, right?
emceemouli said:And the office is closed now I guess..so no updates expected![]()