I can't say it isn't the individual's right to request GCMS notes, or to get one's MP involved, but I have to ask, why, particularly if one still falls within the stated timeline?
For example, LA's timeline is currently pegged at 10 months (or it was the last time I looked a week or so ago), so that's 10 months from the time one gets to Step 2. For those of us whose files hit Step 2 in June 2012, say, I can't imagine why we'd contact the VO until April, 2013, if we haven't heard anything. Recognizing that the stats indicate that 80% will receive their PR within that timeframe, some sooner, why would we tie up valuable man hours or people resources at CIC to answer queries, either from us personally or from our MP's staffers? It won't speed things up, we're in line, our files will be processed when they get processed, and as long as we receive them within the stated timeline, I'm just not sure why the need to request the notes and/or our MPs involvement. And believe me, I'm as anxious as anyone to have my wife's PR in hand, given that we're expecting our first child in December and we'd sure love to be able to have that behind us, but I know how government works and would prefer they keep their noses to the grindstone and keep processing applications, rather than take time to answer copious numbers of emails/phone calls which, for the most part, may be unnecessary and do little, practically speaking, to help.
As a side note, computergeek I get, as he/she has clearly been at this a long time and has reason to want to stay on top of things in order to possibly catch a problem before too long, but for those of us who haven't walked in his/her shoes, it seems to me that it's an unnecessary and likely unprofitable exercise.
Again though, I know it's folks' right, just curious about the "why" of it.