We made digital copies of my PR application in its entirelty, and saved them on 4 thumb drives...just in case.
AmericaninQuebec said:Wow, there are words to describe people like that, but I'll refrain from using them on here! I suppose since you're clearly not staying for more than a week or so at most that's why they haven't bothered to give you the visitor record. It is true that it's mostly up to their discretion, but I find it odd that any of them would tell you something so absurd as that you could only stay 3 or 4 days a week. Just seems downright bizarre, especially when the going agreement between the U.S. and Canada permits Americans to visit for up to 6 mths without a visa (and vice versa for Canadians in the U.S.). She must have really been having a bad day and/or is generally an unpleasant person.
Also, I had them give me multiple 3 or 4 mths visitor records over the past 18 mths. Apparently I was suspicious enough to warrant a shorter entry period, but not enough to deny me entry. The last time I showed up a week before it was supposed to expire, and the border guard gave me the full 6 mths. He also told me he was sorry to report that in his system my file was showing that my PR hadn't yet been decided on. I have found it's better to go for that stuff during the day if possible, or at the very least not on the weekends. I once did it on the way back from a trip home late on a Sunday night (I was a few days away from expiry and didn't feel like wasting gas or time going back to the border for it). It was clear that at 11 pm on a Sunday night there was no real immigration officer on duty, and the guys there really weren't certain what to do. They had to call the head office for help!
Huh? Wow. I was living with my boyfriend (no job, no apartment, no ties to the U.S. apart from my family and student loan bills) for 5 months before we got engaged here in Canada. Granted I think at first I told them I was spending the summer with him while I learned French, but even after the marriage no one ever got on my case like that and it's been 18 mths since I've been here as a visitor. I can't believe they gave you so much trouble! It really makes no sense to me!mjh49783aa said:Once I got to talk to the investigators and showed them the paper they sent me, we had a frank talk - because they've got 'word' that I was living with my girlfriend (now wife) and not just visiting.
AmericaninQuebec said:Huh? Wow. I was living with my boyfriend (no job, no apartment, no ties to the U.S. apart from my family and student loan bills) for 5 months before we got engaged here in Canada. Granted I think at first I told them I was spending the summer with him while I learned French, but even after the marriage no one ever got on my case like that and it's been 18 mths since I've been here as a visitor. I can't believe they gave you so much trouble! It really makes no sense to me!
ddobro2 said:Oh my God, your post had me saying "serenity now!!" and I'm not even the one who had to endure that! Anyway, Facebook to the rescue huh?
My wife and I aren't even 1 hour time zone apart lol I'm in Las Vegas and she's in Halifax. It's a bit far for a quick drive over the border hehehe. Consider yourself lucky my friend.eeeeeeeelectric said:We have friends who are engaged, one living in East Vancouver, and one living in Australia. That is good perspective for us as to just how lucky we are. We only live 1 hour apart.
My wife can only log in with the payment receipt number. She's the sponsor. I can use the File number, the client ID or the receipt. Funny.cantor2537 said:Congrats to everyone!
Just a quick question. I finally got approved for sponsorship last week. They gave me a client number to check my status online. When I input the number and my Date of Birth, last name, and country of birth, I can login fine. However, for my wife, she can't. Is there a different client number for her? Will I be able to see her status from my account? (It just says "Application received" when I login for her side. The sponsorship part says "Decision reached".)
ddobro2 said:Well then my application must have gotted thrown into the MOC pile at Buffalo (is there really a MOC pile at Buffalo, and come on, how big would such pile be?), because not only did I have a "small civil ceremony," I never had a "big wedding to follow" like mcmasters. In fact, I bet I had the smallest wedding of anyone here. I don't think I agree with this rule/theory, even without the bias I have. Under this logic, Kim Kardashian's hypothetical immigration application would totally pass the "marriage of convenience test" (I think 8 million on your wedding would qualify as "big to-do"), whereas mine would fail miserably even though I have managed to stay married a lot longer than 72 days.
I have a digital copy. I filled all the forms on the computer, and all supporting docs were scanned. I didn't want to pay someone to photocopy the whole thing.. lolddobro2 said:For something that took so much time and effort to assemble and is so life-changingly important, making a copy of the PR application package before you send it in for its months-long plight at the case processing centre and regional processing centre is absolutely a good idea. Well really, having a record of anything you send to a government agency is a good idea....