Would you share where it says that CIC is required to provide a sufficient reason to explain the delay in FC PR sponsorship cases that take 6 months or more to process?
I think it's important to remember that 80% of cases are processed within 11 months according their data for the last year. As much as that figure is dissapointing (and vague, actually), it means that 1 out of 5 cases will take more than 11 months to process. This is the reason why many Ministers of Parliament (and their aides working on immigration) are reluctant to really do anything before the 11 month mark. Having said that, CIC does have an important protocol about responding to MPs offices in one of its manuals:
Timeframe for responses to parliamentarians
The standard for reply to MP enquiries is one week (or five working days). Where a substantive
reply within one week is not possible, the MP's office should be advised within one week of receipt
of the enquiry that a reply will be provided shortly and by a specific date. Such delays should be
exceptional and short. Ideally, MPs should receive a response within two (2) working days.
Program managers are responsible for either preparing replies to MPs personally, or closely and
regularly monitoring replies sent by their office for both quality and timeliness. Note that visa
offices must reply to all MP requests.
prophet3 said:
It is CIC official policy written in their policy guide to provide sufficient reason if the processing is longer than 6 months. So I would email them and demand an explanation.