As long as you have listed your work experience in your previous applications, you will be fine. If it was not elaborate, you can mention that isn LoE. The rule is that there should be no discrepancy. Eg. if you claimed that between 2013-2015 you were a student and then in your PR application you claim work experience points for that time frame, than it is a discrepancy.
Any application you file can be looked into and there should be no discrepancy if you have filed multiple applications. If you filed a TRV in which you did not declare a job, and then you claimed a job in your PR application, this is a discrepancy. Similarly if you were refused a visa before, the same has to be declared in the subsequent application filed with IRCC.
If you file any application with IRCC, TRV, WP, PR etc, any of them can be looked into to review your current application and any inconsistency can be a cause of misrepresentation. All applications have to be consistent, and if they are not, a reason on why you omitted the information has to be provided. Even if the reason is that you inadvertently forgot to mention a prior refusal, you have to inform IRCC.
While answering the statutory questions you have to list all prior visa refusals. Failing to declare any prior visa refusal is misrepresentation and the federal court has ruled on it in the following decision:
Algohar v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1364 (CanLII), available at
http://canlii.ca/t/j36dk
It is an applicant's duty to disclose all material information pertaining to ones information and answer all questions truthfully.
If you inadvertently forgot to mention a prior visa refusal, you can send a webform and inform IRCC. Irrespective of what stage your application is at, or if it has even been approved, if it is found that you failed to disclose any material information in your application, it can impact your PR status.
In Tuiran v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 324 (CanLII) the court held, " Section 16(1) of the
Act requires visa applicants to answer all questions truthfully and produce all relevant documents and evidence reasonably required when making an application under the
Act. The purpose of the misrepresentation provisions in the
Act is “to ensure that applicants provide complete, honest and truthful information in every manner when applying for entry into Canada” (
Jiang v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
2011 FC 942 at para
36;
Khan v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
2008 FC 512 at paras
26-29;
Wang v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
2005 FC 1059 at paras
57-58, affirmed in
2006 FCA 345 [
Wang])." I emphasize that it does not matter that the authorities may have the ability to catch the misrepresentation or not. What matters is whether the misrepresentation induced or could have induced an error in the administration of the IRPA.
If you feel that there is a discrepancy, or if you inadvertently missed out answering. questions in your application, you can send a wbfrom and inform IRCC of the same.
