Thank you loads Sir, you are the BEST!This is not misrepresentation, but a mistake and you are correcting it. So no need to worry.
God Bless
Thank you loads Sir, you are the BEST!This is not misrepresentation, but a mistake and you are correcting it. So no need to worry.
Thank you. This person will be available over the phone, only his official email ID will not be functional after one week. In case if he gets call over the phone, he can very well reply to IRCC.Nothing to worry about, IRCC will call the company's number and find out. However, you can raise a CSE and inform IRCC and ask them to contact the company, or give the contact details of another person in the company who will be responsible for it.
Hi Legalfalcon,I will get back to you on this. But please send me a Pm with the links and give me 2-3 days.
Thank you so much!!You should get it rectified, or you can get it done when you land in Canada and point it out to the CBSA officer.
YEs, IRCC published a general notification that they are experiencing delays in releasing the GCMS notes and to catch up, they worked this weekend and some GCMS notes were released. Also, their website was under maintenance, and this also caused some delay.
Hopefully within a few days they will be back on track. This is the information I received from GET GCMS.
Hi LegalFalcon Sir,This weekend you will have it.
Thanks @legalfalconAs per IRCC when evaluating applications:
Express Entry candidates are responsible for ensuring that the information in their profile is accurate and up-to-date at all times.
When a candidate is issued an ITA, their profile information and their CRS score are automatically recorded in GCMS.
If a candidate decides to submit an e-APR, the system automatically transfers the information from their profile to their e-APR for their convenience. The candidate is required to ensure that the information is still accurate before they submit their e-APR to IRCC. If the information transferred from the candidate’s profile is no longer accurate, the candidate must update their application accordingly.
When an applicant submits an e-APR to IRCC, the information in their application is locked, and their CRS score at the time of their application is recorded in GCMS.
Processing offices must compare the information in the applicant’s profile at the time of the round of invitations to the information in their e-APR to ensure that the applicant meets the requirements of section A11.2. Note that not all discrepancies should result in a refusal.
Further, when evaluating an application under A11.2 -
An applicant’s CRS score is automatically recorded in GCMS at the time when
At the time of the e-APR, processing officers should compare both CRS scores to determine which of the following scenarios should be applied:
- their ITA is issued; and
- their e-APR is submitted.
However, the change in the circumstances, or a discrepancy should be genuine and not done as a misrepresentation. To evaluate that you will need a well drafted LoE and evidence to support it. In this regards IRCC states:
- If the applicant’s CRS score at the time of the e-APR is equal to or higher than the lowest-ranked score in the round of invitations, the application will not be refused under section A11.2, as long as the applicant’s supporting documentation corroborates their claims and they continue to meet the MEC for Express Entry, including the requirements of the program to which they were invited to apply.
- If the applicant’s CRS score at the time of the e-APR is lower than the lowest-ranked score in the round of invitations, the application should be refused under section A11.2 for not having maintained the qualifications that would justify the ITA.
Applicants are warned that if they misrepresent their qualifications in their Express Entry profile or their e-APR, they may face a five-year ban from submitting any further immigration applications to Canada, including temporary residence applications.
If there are discrepancies between the information in the applicant’s profile and the information in the applicant’s e-APR which are not the result of a legitimate change in the applicant’s circumstance, the officer should determine whether a finding of misrepresentation under section A40 applies.
For additional guidance on misrepresentation, processing offices should consult the misrepresentation section of chapter ENF 2 (PDF, 726.46 KB). When processing Provincial Nominee Program (PNP) applications, processing offices should also consult PNP applications: Determining Admissibility.
The procedures for determining misrepresentation, including procedural fairness, remain the same under Express Entry.
If both section A11.2 and section A40 apply, the application should be refused on both grounds.
Hi @legalfalconYEs, IRCC published a general notification that they are experiencing delays in releasing the GCMS notes and to catch up, they worked this weekend and some GCMS notes were released. Also, their website was under maintenance, and this also caused some delay.
Hopefully within a few days they will be back on track. This is the information I received from GET GCMS.
Thanks @legalfalcon One more piece of information. I called up IRCC and the agent informed me that my application was approved on 28th Aug, and the renewed passport was added to application on 30th August (even though I sent it on 14th Aug). So that might be reason that expiry date of my visa is shown as Feb 2018 as it was approved before new passport information got updated. That lady said that she can't do much as an agent and suggested to write an email to CPC-Ottawa.You can request and see if IRCC will approve the request, which is very difficult.