tulip_001 said:
I see, I also did some search and you are right, for the year 2016 I think I have to pay the taxes. But I am now looking on how to reduce the total amount. Also, for year 2017, if I did not stay in Canada and do not have any significant residential ties, I will fill the tax return form as non-resident or I will not have to fill the form at all?
I am not well versed in Canadian tax obligations outside my own experiences. What I have referenced so far is actually fairly rudimentary. (I have gone out my way to structure my business so as to simplify my returns as much as possible, being adverse to paying large accounting fees, but I have done so in a way which means I pay taxes to Canada based on income from abroad, and in a way which fortunately allows me to avoid there being any tax due in the other country, with which Canada does have a tax treaty, and in which I nonetheless need to file a return . . . but having to file multiple returns based on different accounting methods and different currencies, different rules governing particular deductible expenses, and so on, is indeed an administrative hassle, a real and somewhat costly inconvenience. The revenues, however, make it worth it.)
For 2017, my
general understanding is that if you do certain things to terminate residency in Canada, and you are not resident in Canada during the year, and your presence in Canada is minimal, you
could (as in you
might) qualify to file a Canadian return as a
non-resident, or perhaps legally be entitled to not file a Canadian return at all. What to do, how this actually works in a particular case, I do not begin to know the details.
Once the rush season has passed, then it would be the time to seek assistance from a qualified tax professional, which will require some serious homework on your part . . . both to first get as familiar with the CRA rules as you can (a professional's assistance tends to be much better if the client is well-informed to begin with), and to find someone both competent and willing to offer assistance (I have found some accountants who will give a consultation . . . just no one I can recommend for this situation). Waiting until late in the year will run into the beginning of the next rush season.
If you carefully go through the information which CRA provides you may be able to determine, for yourself, whether you will need to file a Canadian return for 2017. Or the alternative outcomes.
Note of caution, however, that even though there is NO direct impact on PR status based on your tax filing status . . .
. . . once you do this, these are circumstances which can be considered in assessing your compliance with the PR Residency Obligation. This is mostly about what inferences might be drawn from certain circumstances and facts. And, more particularly, about what inferences might be drawn from the absence of evidence showing permanent residence in Canada (in fact permanent residence, as in where one in fact is settled and living).
A resident of Canada tax return for a given year is affirmative evidence tending to corroborate residency, hence presence, in Canada. But it is more than that. It is affirmative evidence of permanently settling and living in Canada.
It can be a lot more difficult to prove actual presence if the contrary is indicated.
In other topics I have repeatedly addressed the impact it can have in a Residency Determination if the PR is not well-settled and living permanently in Canada. I do not mean to go into that in depth here, but just to give a
heads-up that lengthy absences, particularly lengthy periods of time living and working outside Canada, can change the dynamics in how CBSA or IRCC weighs evidence of presence, and in particular what influences how certain inferences are made. In this regard, remember that most PRs need CBSA or IRCC to make the
inference the PR was in Canada for many days in-between dates for which the PR has overt evidence of presence. And without such inferences, it can be extremely difficult to
prove actual presence during all those in-between days.
Terminating residency in Canada in conjunction with an extended absence and working abroad is a situation which can cause serious problems proving compliance with the PR RO . . . and it is always the PR's burden to
prove compliance. If and when a PR's circumstances weaken the inference that the PR was in Canada days between last entry and next exit, what will prove presence may not be at all easy to compile and present. Especially if the PR is
cutting-it-close. Actually being in Canada is
not enough to keep PR status; the PR may be required to affirmatively prove days in Canada.