Hi. Would appreciate if someone can help me. We migrated 1.5 yrs ago and looking at the job situation in Canada , i decided to continue my job abroad while my family settled in Canada. I paid the full tax on my world wide income eventhough i was not living there and was considered a resident of canada. My question is since i paid full taxes in canada shouldn't my time be counted towards my PR days since i am considered a resident?
So I'm a resident for tax purposes but considered a non resident for PR days calculation?
To be clear, the relationship between tax filing status and immigration status is largely evidentiary. Neither dictates the other. Each may be considered relevant to the other. BUT each are determined
independently, based on criteria specific to each, determined independently by the respective government agencies: CRA and IRCC.
The CRA has its own rules for determining tax filing status and tax payment obligations.
IRCC has its own rules (pursuant to IRPA) for determining compliance with the PR Residency Obligation.
Thus, CRA has criteria pursuant to which it determines key things including:
-- who is a resident of Canada and must file a resident tax return (pursuant to which world wide income needs to be reported; actual tax obligation depends on other factors, such as treaty arrangements with country that is source of income)
-- who is a non-resident of Canada but nonetheless must file a non-resident tax return (and pay taxes on Canadian income)
-- who is a non-resident and not required to file any tax return
-- who may want to file a return even if it is not necessary (such as to qualify for this or that benefit)
In contrast, for purposes of determining compliance with the PR Residency Obligation, it is NOT dependent on residency. Compliance with the PR RO depends on
PRESENCE. However, a person's "residency" is a relevant factor when IRCC is weighing evidence of actual presence. The actual calculation in a PR RO compliance determination, however, is based on counting days physically present in Canada (with some possible credits otherwise but not likely relevant here).
That is, the PR RO is NOT actually a "residency" obligation. It is a physical presence requirement. A 2/5 years in Canada rule. A PR might never establish residency in Canada and still meet the PR RO (and indeed, many PRs spend most of their time abroad but still manage to spend at least 730/1825 days in Canada).
In contrast, a PR might establish residency in Canada but be employed abroad so much he or she spends more than 1095 days in a period of five years (1825 days) abroad, and thus fail to comply with the PR RO.
Otherwise, I am skeptical of the tax advice some have posted here. My sense is that in some ways it is more complicated. And, more to the point, there are probably alternative approaches, recognizing however that each has consequences. Nonetheless, tax filing obligations (which is one thing), and tax paying obligations (which is another), and various entitlements to benefits (which are yet another thing), are determined according to CRA rules, and those rules are largely mandatory. Not a whole lot of room to play games, even though more than a few tee it up and try.
Main thing is:
-- recognize that CRA prescribes the rules governing who must file a tax return, what kind of return, and what taxes must be paid; these rules apply regardless immigration status
-- recognize that IRPA (the immigration law) and IRCC dictate the PR's obligations for keeping PR status, pursuant to which a PR is obligated to be physically present in Canada for two in every five years; actual presence is what counts