+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445

farazafzal

Hero Member
Aug 20, 2015
676
321
Job Offer........
Pre-Assessed..
Hello everyone.

I would like to remind everyone that I have opened 3 useful threads. These threads address ; collection of facts, common errors done by the candidates, common question asked by candidates.

Thread 1: Reasons for Rejection
http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/reasons-for-rejection-faraz-summary-t471670.0.html

Thread 2: Changing photo specifications of a Digital Photo using a small software by anyone.
http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/cic-photo-specifications-resolution-solved-faraz-t483110.0.html

Thread 3: Correctly uploading documents of multiple work experience in their respective place holders.
http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/multiple-work-experience-document-upload-placeholders-t483188.0.html#new

I am going to add these thread links to my signatures so that people can address them quickly, in case someone needs help.

Good luck everyone.
 
Re: Rejection Reasons- Photo Specs - Work experience placeholders (faraz)

farazafzal said:
Hello everyone.

I would like to remind everyone that I have opened 3 useful threads. These threads address ; collection of facts, common errors done by the candidates, common question asked by candidates.

Thread 1: Reasons for Rejection
http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/reasons-for-rejection-faraz-summary-t471670.0.html

Thread 2: Changing photo specifications of a Digital Photo using a small software by anyone.
http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/cic-photo-specifications-resolution-solved-faraz-t483110.0.html

Thread 3: Correctly uploading documents of multiple work experience in their respective place holders.
http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/multiple-work-experience-document-upload-placeholders-t483188.0.html#new

I am going to add these thread links to my signatures so that people can address them quickly, in case someone needs help.

Good luck everyone.
Is placing work experience in the wrong place a reason for rejection
 
Re: Rejection Reasons- Photo Specs - Work experience placeholders (faraz)

It should not be. Depends upon the officer. Honestly, I don't think the CIC officer would spend time in correcting the order of your documents. NOC 1 against Experience 2 , and NOC 2 against experience 1.

However, this should not be a point to worry, as it can be corrected by sending Case Specific Enquiry.
 
Re: Rejection Reasons- Photo Specs - Work experience placeholders (faraz)

Thanks for the info
I did submitted in wrong order, how can i correct mine

farazafzal said:
Hello everyone.

I would like to remind everyone that I have opened 3 useful threads. These threads address ; collection of facts, common errors done by the candidates, common question asked by candidates.

Thread 1: Reasons for Rejection
http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/reasons-for-rejection-faraz-summary-t471670.0.html

Thread 2: Changing photo specifications of a Digital Photo using a small software by anyone.
http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/cic-photo-specifications-resolution-solved-faraz-t483110.0.html

Thread 3: Correctly uploading documents of multiple work experience in their respective place holders.
http://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/multiple-work-experience-document-upload-placeholders-t483188.0.html#new

I am going to add these thread links to my signatures so that people can address them quickly, in case someone needs help.

Good luck everyone.
 
Re: Rejection Reasons- Photo Specs - Work experience placeholders (faraz)

Thanks afzal, I really appreciate for your help

I just submitted my application 2 days ago, so do you suggest me to send case CSE right away

Also do you suggest me to attach any documents or just to explain what happened

please guide me



farazafzal said:
 
Re: Rejection Reasons- Photo Specs - Work experience placeholders (faraz)

Please change the title. You cannot be rejected because of incorrect photo specs.

See http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/tools/perm/express/intake-complete.asp under Other Documents.
 
Re: Rejection Reasons- Photo Specs - Work experience placeholders (faraz)

RamInCanada said:
Thanks afzal, I really appreciate for your help

I just submitted my application 2 days ago, so do you suggest me to send case CSE right away

Also do you suggest me to attach any documents or just to explain what happened

please guide me

O yes. Send it right away. It won't take much of your time. Attach documents to make it clear. Tell them the place holders and the documents against them were swapped as it only mentioned experience 1 and experience 2. So I my experience documents for job 1 and NOC 1xxx as well as Job 2 and NOC 2xxx are attached.

Good luck
 
Re: Rejection Reasons- Photo Specs - Work experience placeholders (faraz)

ashu1710 said:
Please change the title. You cannot be rejected because of incorrect photo specs.

See http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/tools/perm/express/intake-complete.asp under Other Documents.

Well I am sorry if the title is misleading. Actually the title reflect the three different topics within this thread.
1. Reasons for rejection
2. Photo Specs
3. Work Experience place holders.

But I will try to modify If I can.
 
Re: Rejection Reasons- Photo Specs - Work experience placeholders (faraz)

farazafzal said:
Well I am sorry if the title is misleading. Actually the title reflect the three different topics within this thread.
1. Reasons for rejection
2. Photo Specs
3. Work Experience place holders.

But I will try to modify If I can.

I know. The way the title is structured makes it look like Photo Specs and Work Experience placeholders are reasons for rejection. ;D
 
Re: Rejection Reasons- Photo Specs - Work experience placeholders (faraz)

ashu1710 said:
I know. The way the title is structured makes it look like Photo Specs and Work Experience placeholders are reasons for rejection. ;D

I think then I should keep this title. At least it raises a flag and people read about it..