frege
Hero Member
- Jun 13, 2012
- 29
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- Paris
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- 01-05-2012
- AOR Received.
- none
- File Transfer...
- 01-08-2012
- Med's Done....
- 02-12-2011
- Interview........
- none
- Passport Req..
- 28-11-2012 (copy only)
- VISA ISSUED...
- 05-12-2012
- LANDED..........
- 15-12-2012
Maybe I can clarify my question a bit:Leon said:I don't think so because for a sponsorship application for the kids, she needs to do an address history but for a TRV extension she doesn't so there would be nothing on paper to attract the attention of immigration to the fact that she doesn't meet the residency obligation. However, they might be suspicious and want to know why she isn't applying to sponsor them for PR and they could refuse their visitor status extensions. She could also keep their status alive by having them leave the country and return on a regular basis to get entered for 6 months again. However, if she goes with them, she is at risk every time that immigration may decide not to let her in and she will have to tell them about her PR status in order to be allowed in and then they may report her for not meeting the residency requirements. It would be simpler if the grandparents or father of the children come and pick them up and bring them back.
Staying for 2 years is a fairly simple thing if you get in if you are alone or with a PR family but as soon as there are non-PR kids in the picture, it quickly becomes complicated.
1. Is CIC legally allowed to initiate an investigation of someone's residency obligation based on external evidence (e.g., a poison pen letter, information received from provincial authorities, information contained in someone else's visa application), or does the person being investigated have to be applying for something?
2. In the latter case, would applying for a TRV for your kids count as an application made by you?