@fabianonetto : Do not private message me. You want me to respond to your apology, let's do it here, since you seem to like to use the public forum to call me out.
Let's recap your statements:
The statement you made is baseless. The statement you made here:
; has no basis in fact. If there is "a criteria", please share with the class what you suspect that is. Because there literally is no case in CIC history that is the same, ever. Even if they are identical twins that filed at an identical point in time, their cases are different. So, I stand by my statement that it is in fact a baseless claim. There is no criteria to expedite your case. There was no negative or derrogatory tone attached to this. It's a fact.
If it was my wife, I would have planned it better. I would have insisted she study English before immersing her in an all-English society. I love my wife, but I am not able to constantly be at her behest to help her, while working. And frankly, she would have gone crazy and left. The 4 month wait was too long for her OWP as it was. To top this off, you're asking me, in a very pointed tone to comment on how I would have handled this. And we did survive, without any insurance for her, on one income, thanks.
I am not you. We are not friends. Your behaviour has precluded that possibility.
Canada is not a prison. She could have returned home.
I'd appreciate you not advising me how to conduct myself. I do not do that to you, so I would expect the same simple courtesy. And I would also suggest that you don't attempt to evaluate my life, or my concerns, just as I did not do to you, as they are not your business.
I assure you, if you felt I was making fun of you, you are sadly mistaken. I would be happy to give you an example, if you wish?
"That is definitly good news" said in response to the same statement that I had left. Which is it???
Lastly, you do not need to issue an apology. Do not message me any further, and mind your own business, please.