+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
can-app said:
Even CIC accesses work exp on the basis of role and responsibilities and not designation.

yes, logically this is the correct way. Rejection should not be based on your job title.
They should match the roles and responsibilities.
 
muk123 said:
I have already gone for the second review.
I don't know how much time they will take to reply


CIC is very cooperative with applicant, but provinces are not, they just harsh on applicant & reject :-[ :( :( :( :( :(
 
muk123 said:
hello Dear Ashu and all

today my application got ineligible.

SINP Reason
"You have not scored a minimum of 60 out of 100 points on the Skilled Worker Points Assessment grid. You have not received as many points as you claimed for work experience. From SINP assessment, you have only 2 years and 10 months of eligible work experience in NOC 1225 in the past ten years that can be awarded points. You were not awarded points for other experience in occupations either higher or lower in skill level as opposed to NOC 1225, and they are not in demand."

but I could not understand how they have calculated my experience 2 years and 10 months. Because as per my experience letter, it was clearly mentioned that I have been performing the same jobs and responsibilities since 01.09.2010 to the date of submission of my application in November, 2016. As per company's policy only my designation changed but my roles and responsibilities remained same. So total more than 6 years of experience related to noc 1225.

following detail was mentioned in my experience letter alongwith roles and responsibilities.

From 02.07.2007 to 01.07.2008 : Management Trainee
From 02.07.2008 to 31.12.2012 : Assistant Executive
From 01.01.2013 to 31.12.2015 : Executive Purchase
From 01.01.2016 to till date : Manager Purchase
It is full time permanent position in this organization. He works 48 hours per week. His gross salary per month is Rs. ***** (Rupees *******in words).
He has been performing the following roles and responsibilities since 01.09.2010.

now how they calculate my experience and what is their reason.

please help should i make a second review or new application or both.

More over i was worried about my fund maturity period which to my surprise they have not mentioned at all.

thanks

Hi Muk123,

I also belong to the same NOC and recently I have also been marked ineligible by giving the same justification as in your case. I have filed the second review and am waiting for their feedback. Did you, by any chance receive any feedback on your 2nd review?

Is there anyone in the forum who would have logged 2nd review request and received positive response. Any NOC?
 
Please add me to whatsapp group : +1 647 968 3656 (sinp oid)
 
Hello,

i would like to explain on the following :
i am a mechanical engineer (bachelor honors holder), i was working in Hvac, plumbing and fire protection for the last 7 years, i applied under 2232 (technologist for saskatchewan EE), should expect any objection from saskachewann officers for this application as i have great experience in heat, ventilation and air conditioning
i thought that might happen because i think i can also fall under NOC 2132 (enginees) category
please let me know if someboday had this same scenario or give me some ideas
and please also add me to your group +2499 225 40 532

Thanks