Hi Everyone,
I am a Canadian citizen residing in Quebec, and I recently submitted visit visa applications for my parents, brother, and his wife who are Indian citizens but residents of UAE to attend my wedding in Canada. Unfortunately, all four applications were refused for the following reasons:
• I am not satisfied that you will leave Canada at the end of your stay as required by paragraph 179(b) of the IRPR (https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/SOR-2002-227/section-179.html). I am refusing your application because you have not established that you will leave Canada, based on the following factors:
• Your assets and financial situation are insufficient to support the stated purpose of travel for yourself (and any accompanying family member(s), if applicable).
• The purpose of your visit to Canada is not consistent with a temporary stay given the details you have provided in your application.
• Your immigration status outside your country of nationality or habitual residence.
• You have submitted documentation that lacks authenticity as part of your application. This has diminished the overall credibility of your submission.
To give you some context, my parents are retired, while my brother and his wife both have stable jobs in the UAE. They have been residents there for over 20 years. I even submitted their flight tickets to demonstrate their intention to visit for my wedding.
While I am extremely disappointed that my family won't be able to attend my wedding, I am looking for guidance on how to address these concerns for their future applications. Besides adding more savings to their bank accounts, I'm unsure what changes can be made, as their situation has remained largely unchanged for many years.
I am particularly troubled by the mention of "documentation that lacks authenticity," as I am confident in the accuracy and legitimacy of all the documents submitted. I'm unsure what could have triggered this claim and how to provide further proof of authenticity.
Any insights or suggestions from the forum would be greatly appreciated. I am even willing to pursue a judicial review if necessary to clear this matter.
Thank you for your time.
@canuck78
I am a Canadian citizen residing in Quebec, and I recently submitted visit visa applications for my parents, brother, and his wife who are Indian citizens but residents of UAE to attend my wedding in Canada. Unfortunately, all four applications were refused for the following reasons:
• I am not satisfied that you will leave Canada at the end of your stay as required by paragraph 179(b) of the IRPR (https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/SOR-2002-227/section-179.html). I am refusing your application because you have not established that you will leave Canada, based on the following factors:
• Your assets and financial situation are insufficient to support the stated purpose of travel for yourself (and any accompanying family member(s), if applicable).
• The purpose of your visit to Canada is not consistent with a temporary stay given the details you have provided in your application.
• Your immigration status outside your country of nationality or habitual residence.
• You have submitted documentation that lacks authenticity as part of your application. This has diminished the overall credibility of your submission.
To give you some context, my parents are retired, while my brother and his wife both have stable jobs in the UAE. They have been residents there for over 20 years. I even submitted their flight tickets to demonstrate their intention to visit for my wedding.
While I am extremely disappointed that my family won't be able to attend my wedding, I am looking for guidance on how to address these concerns for their future applications. Besides adding more savings to their bank accounts, I'm unsure what changes can be made, as their situation has remained largely unchanged for many years.
I am particularly troubled by the mention of "documentation that lacks authenticity," as I am confident in the accuracy and legitimacy of all the documents submitted. I'm unsure what could have triggered this claim and how to provide further proof of authenticity.
Any insights or suggestions from the forum would be greatly appreciated. I am even willing to pursue a judicial review if necessary to clear this matter.
Thank you for your time.
@canuck78