If you personally know, confident and indeed qualified to apply for citizenship, why would you send additional documents other than what are required. It's the same as rejecting your own application with the basic requirements alone.
RQ despite all documents submitted with citizenship application
- Thread starter whiz
- Start date
What I'm saying there is a crisis of confidence between CIC and immigrants. Regardless what the reasons are, they should not punish the majority of good law-abiding immigrants by the deeds of bunch of bad apples. Such delays caused by RQ is punishment as far as everybody is concerned. My application was far more than a complete application. The only reason I've been sent a RQ is to put me on the non-routine process (if there is a process at the first place!). CIC failed a lot of people, and honestly, I find it difficult to believe they're doing their job properly and according to a clear process.us2yow said:
I'm confident I met all requirements and my application is 110% complete, but I'm not confident CIC have the tendency to believe so. By default, every immigrant is considered a liar, and it takes ALOT of work, hurdles and hassle from the immigrant to prove otherwise. We've seen thousands of examples about people who are actively contributing to Canada, they have decent jobs, bought houses, their children grew in Canada and the only way they got their citizenship was by suing CIC. I'm sick of this carrot-and-stick system.Juney said:
Whiz,
I definitely share with you your opinion. Same thoughts I already expressed on other threads.
Trust me it is a real pain when you receive RQ and you believe that each and every detail in your application is indeed true. To answer your point that CIC officer didn’t look your documents, you should know that this is a bureaucratic system. Every officer is responsible to do certain task on your file. If someone is assigned to issue RQ, then he blindly will go through the checklist and fill it up. I don’t think they will care about what you sent. Once again, we don’t mind receiving RQ provided that CIC is achieving a fair process among all applicants. In my opinion as they spend efforts to issue RQ, the should also have enough resources to process the RQ responses that deemed to be true and honest so they go back in line with other applications. I’m sure if it goes that way you don’t mind the efforts you spent collecting documents to respond to RQ. I’m sure that no one at all will complain if fraud and suspicious applications take long processing time.
I definitely share with you your opinion. Same thoughts I already expressed on other threads.
Trust me it is a real pain when you receive RQ and you believe that each and every detail in your application is indeed true. To answer your point that CIC officer didn’t look your documents, you should know that this is a bureaucratic system. Every officer is responsible to do certain task on your file. If someone is assigned to issue RQ, then he blindly will go through the checklist and fill it up. I don’t think they will care about what you sent. Once again, we don’t mind receiving RQ provided that CIC is achieving a fair process among all applicants. In my opinion as they spend efforts to issue RQ, the should also have enough resources to process the RQ responses that deemed to be true and honest so they go back in line with other applications. I’m sure if it goes that way you don’t mind the efforts you spent collecting documents to respond to RQ. I’m sure that no one at all will complain if fraud and suspicious applications take long processing time.
As I and others have clearly pointed out, the job of the person doing the triage criteria screening is not to assess residency.whiz said:I'd vote for: "he got a lazy citizenship officer, who simply sent out an RQ without reading the attached documents". It seems officers enjoy the upper hand and power they exploit against us, poor immigrants. :
It would be improper for a civil servant to spend the taxpayer's dollars going outside the scope of his or her duties to consider extraneous matter in doing his or her job. Especially where such extraneous matter is not relevant to the decision that person is making . . . that person is looking at the information in the application and required documents, and comparing that information to what CIC records reflect, to decide whether the triage criteria requires the issuance of RQ. If such circumstances exist, RQ is to be issued. It would be malfeasance to not issue RQ in that instance -- no matter what additional information and documentation is included with the application.
This is not to say that the triage criteria is fair. This is not to say the triage criteria do not result in the issuance of RQ to qualified applicants. Obviously, the criteria are designed to capture as many truly questionable cases as possible, and thus will necessarily capture more than just the questionable cases. So, yes, qualified applicants get RQ'd.
But that has nothing to do with the personal insult, the unfounded disparaging allegation of laziness aimed at the civil servant who was simply doing his or her job.
Hi Whiz,
Did you observe that my application was received on 18th Nov as well.
Hmm..
Did you observe that my application was received on 18th Nov as well.
Hmm..
datascientist said:
Hi eileenf,
You are right . I would not correlate, as i do not have total visibility of all the info to derive that conclusion.
Has any one from Nov (Mississauga) other than me and Nov 06 2014 received RQ?
Just checked the tracker ,not too many Mississauga applicants in November.
You are right . I would not correlate, as i do not have total visibility of all the info to derive that conclusion.
Has any one from Nov (Mississauga) other than me and Nov 06 2014 received RQ?
Just checked the tracker ,not too many Mississauga applicants in November.
eileenf said: