Hello everyone, I have met the PR residency obligations but could not stay until the PR card was renewed due to a health emergency of my family member who is in India. My PR card is expired. Should i send the PR card application to IRCC? I have the PR card renewal application package ready and have left it with one of my close relatives who is in Canada, he can mail it to IRCC.
I'm in India now. So, if i apply for a PR card renewal from outside Canada, will this be rejected?
As observed by
@canuck78, to complete the application for a PR card the applicant must declare they are IN Canada (otherwise the form to apply for a PR card cannot be properly completed).
What the impact there will be if the PR employs some technicality or semantic twist to overtly avoid explicitly making an obviously false declaration, is hard to forecast. Not a good gamble. For PR in RO breach, at best this seriously risks elevating the scrutiny and strictness encountered. For a PR not in breach, there is little or nothing to be gained.
Note: PR card applications made by a PR are not ordinarily "
rejected" as such. Main question is whether the application triggers IRCC to initiate 44(1) Inadmissibility proceedings, which can lead to the loss of PR status and being issued a Removal Order.
Is it possible to apply for PR card from Canada and then later travel abroad, does it impact the PR card application.
i understand to come back PRTD will be reqiured, but that should be a seperate process not linked to PR card application.
What you describe can apply to a very broad range of scenarios, which in turn can have a widely varying impact on what happens.
In itself, travel abroad while a PR card application is pending is very common and
NOT an issue.
What matters are other factors, ranging from being abroad when the current PR card expires (thus raising the need for a PR TD to return to Canada, as you mention), to those cases in which IRCC perceives the PR to be residing abroad (and thus is more likely to refer the application for Secondary Review, and far more likely to require an in-person pick-up when a new PR card is issued).
And there is a difference between the PR who has been living in Canada, who makes a PR card application, and who then travels abroad, VERSUS the PR who appears to be living outside Canada, who makes a trip to Canada and while briefly in Canada makes the PR card application, then returns to home abroad.
PRs can still do the latter without that in itself being a problem. However, even the most dull total-stranger-bureaucrat is likely to see this for what it is,
fudging, even if it is more or less still colouring inside the lines. So, it might cause the processing agent handling the application to perk up their ears, pay more attention and dig a little deeper, be more strict or skeptical. But what matters is whether the PR is complying with the RO. For PRs in RO compliance, worst case scenario is being required to appear in person to pick-up a new PR card. Which requires traveling back to Canada, leading to . . .
i understand to come back PRTD will be reqiured, but that should be a seperate process not linked to PR card application
I am not sure what you mean or are concerned about in regards to saying a PR TD application should not be linked to a PR card application. All processing of immigrants, even the brief examination at the border of returning PRs, is linked. It's been about a decade or so (at least roughly) since IRCC and CBSA migrated to one integrated immigrant-client record system, GCMS, and for PRs every aspect of their immigration history is linked (except those records discarded, deleted, or destroyed, which many are after certain periods of time).
How one application might affect another is more complex. What mostly matters is the information itself (the facts).
If the individual applying for a PR TD is determined to be a PR in compliance with the Residency Obligation, a PR TD will be issued. The fact a PR card application is pending will not affect this.
The visa office processing a PR TD application is basically focused on just a few things:
-- identity of person applying
-- Canadian status of person applying
-- admissibility of the person applying
Thus, to be more specific, if the applicant is positively identified as a person with PR status in Canada, the visa office reviews the application and, of course, the applicant, sufficiently to verify the PR has met the PR Residency Obligation and thus is not "
inadmissible." When the visa office verifies the applicant is a PR, and has met the PR RO (thus not inadmissible), a PR TD will be issued.
However, reviewing the "
applicant" necessarily includes reviewing the PR's client records in GCMS, which will include reviewing historical information and any information in regards to anything that is pending, including any processing attendant a PR card application or a sponsorship application. The outcome of one is not directly linked to the other, but the information is linked . . . and for information provided by the PR, well, it best be consistent from one application to another.
And even though the outcome of one is not directly linked to the other, if the underlying information/facts in one indicates inadmissibility, the same information/facts will be considered and will influence the other. After all, if the PR is in breach of the RO, as ascertained in processing one application, that means they are in breach of the RO and inadmissible, and that will have an impact on whether a PR TD is issued.