Rejection possible after PPR?

[rollingpunjab]

Speaking about analogy... You know, things happen... Let's see if you can follow the rule of similarity and show any example of "gravity being repulsive in some corner of the Universe".

seems like there are lots n lots of jobless people in the world. And the irony is, with all the time they have, they just wanna waste in useless arguments. Neither they wanna help nor they will let anyone else to help someone in need.

 

[rollingpunjab]

Well, that's not about semantics at all. The question was whether it may or may not happen. The answer is "yes, it may happen". Because it happen in the past, and there is nothing in the Immigration Act and in rules of application assessment process which would prevent this from happening. Now speaking about unlikely, can you measure how unlikely it is? You know, chances to die in plane crash is one in 11 million, but it is 100% to those, who already died in plane crash.
You think, you know enough about immigration process, but you actually doesn't. Your knowledge is mostly based on the information you reading in this forum and your own experience. Believe me only something like 1% (my opinion) of people who got rejected posted here about their rejection. I am on this forum much longer than you and I myself struggled with immigration process for 2 years. And the only thing I learned about dealing with CIC, is uncertainty. You would not believe for what reason ppl got rejected. You can't say you're PR until you get your CoPR signed.

Please relax we ain't here to defeat Einstein's theories or newton's laws. Better relax and stay calm if you got nothing to provide as a genuine opinion or some experience note in relation to the topic. Discuss all those theories with class 10th or probably class 12th student. It would be useful to him/her, not the people here. Don't waste your talent here Sir.

 

[pfse]

What's the deal here?

Asivad just wanted to help. Using analogy or not doesn't even matter as long as the question is answered. Whether you agree or disagree it's up to you.

Well wrong analogy sometime may leave wrong impression. For example, analogy with "repulsive gravity" would leave impression that this never gonna happen, because no one observed something like this. This is not the case with "rejection after PPR".
The applicant might be rejected at any stage of the application process. CIC has advanced and sophisticated QA control and QA supervises may pick any case at any stage and override VO decision in the case. The QA went even more strict few years ago when CIC put 11,000 completed PR and Citizenship applications under investigation due to multiple immigration fraud cases (including cases where CIC officers were involved).
Sometime ago I read federal court case where someone appealed the decision to refuse his application because he read in the Caips notes that his application was approved by VO but refused further by Supervisor. He didn't disclose his USA visa refusal and VO decided that this is not critical to his application and approved it. The Supervisor denied the application and imposed 2 years ban due to misrepresentation. The applicant lost the case.

 

[Can.ott]

Can we please rename this thread to Probabilistic Theories & their applications in Physics??

Peace all!

I think the post name should be "Analogy,gravity & its effect on Canadavisa"

 

[aeropostale]

Well wrong analogy sometime may leave wrong impression. For example, analogy with "repulsive gravity" would leave impression that this never gonna happen, because no one observed something like this. This is not the case with "rejection after PPR".
The applicant might be rejected at any stage of the application process. CIC has advanced and sophisticated QA control and QA supervises may pick any case at any stage and override VO decision in the case. The QA went even more strict few years ago when CIC put 11,000 completed PR and Citizenship applications under investigation due to multiple immigration fraud cases (including cases where CIC officers were involved).
Sometime ago I read federal court case where someone appealed the decision to refuse his application because he read in the Caips notes that his application was approved by VO but refused further by Supervisor. He didn't disclose his USA visa refusal and VO decided that this is not critical to his application and approved it. The Supervisor denied the application and imposed 2 years ban due to misrepresentation. The applicant lost the case.

Hi Pfse,

I'm sorry if you were on the receiving end of any rejection or delay.. if not I sense a little negativity and aggression in your posts.. everyone here is anxious and also frustrated at times due to delay... but remaining positive helps.. I agree with you in the case of Murphy's law, "Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong." But as Asivad anac had mentioned that it is highly unlikely... Also that should not stop anyone from being positive and to suggest positivity (if its a word )to others as well..

Why do we have to believe in and look out for negativity.. I always suggest everyone to reassure one another..

Smile.. it helps

 

[rollingpunjab]

Well wrong analogy sometime may leave wrong impression. For example, analogy with "repulsive gravity" would leave impression that this never gonna happen, because no one observed something like this. This is not the case with "rejection after PPR".
The applicant might be rejected at any stage of the application process. CIC has advanced and sophisticated QA control and QA supervises may pick any case at any stage and override VO decision in the case. The QA went even more strict few years ago when CIC put 11,000 completed PR and Citizenship applications under investigation due to multiple immigration fraud cases (including cases where CIC officers were involved).
Sometime ago I read federal court case where someone appealed the decision to refuse his application because he read in the Caips notes that his application was approved by VO but refused further by Supervisor. He didn't disclose his USA visa refusal and VO decided that this is not critical to his application and approved it. The Supervisor denied the application and imposed 2 years ban due to misrepresentation. The applicant lost the case.

That's ok. But it will not happen on routine basis. it's an off event. But in general after receiving PPR, it is very unlikely for rejection to occur untill and unless one commits grave mistake of concealing facts regarding one's change in condition during the application process.
Please don't over react.

 

[nhabib]

Immigration is a new principal of Physics.

01. Every applicant is attracted to the immigration process which is gravity of Immigration
02. An applicant only can get PR is he becomes fan of such scientists who make their day
03. Unless an external force by senior is applied your application dont move.

@bestofluck It looks like you are bragging. His answers were more comprehensive and logical. He was not discovering new theories of physics. He was using an analogy for the sake of illustration, which is quite understandable. The type of answer, an applicant was looking for through his question. You seem more busy with your own ego and your answer was no help anyway. So please shut it down buddy.