RECOMENDATION : REVIEW REQUIRED BY OFFICIER senior members please advise

[saja_roy]

I got my GCMS notes which i applied on 4th feb 2015. it says
"Employment Letter does not provide information regarding applicants duties and functions within the company.Web based search conducted online information verified. .... ..... some other stuffs...." At last its written RECOMENDATION : REVIEW REQUIRED BY OFFICIER.

does the above line "Web based search conducted online information verified." means that though its not mentioned in the letter but they got the information by web-based search and the next VO can review and take a decision?

I have already submitted my work permit petition along with PR application in which my duties and functions are listed. do i need to send aything else or wait for the VO to review. The due date mentioned for review was on 28th feb 2015. I have not got my MR yet. May be due to this eligibility concern.

I will not be able to provide any other letter from company since i have left the company 5 months back.

please advise.

 

[wssun]

"Web based search conducted online information verified." means the VO googled your company and found your company's website

 

[saja_roy]

"Web based search conducted online information verified." means the VO googled your company and found your company's website

Thanks for your response. really appriciate.

so it means i need to provide some details for the roles & responsibility incase VO doenot look into the petition which i have submitted and asks for more details. The point is should i wait for VO to respond or send it upfront.

 

[wssun]

Thanks for your response. really appriciate.

so it means i need to provide some details for the roles & responsibility incase VO doenot look into the petition which i have submitted and asks for more details. The point is should i wait for VO to respond or send it upfront.

If I were you, I would send in the detailed letter right now

 

[Jan30]

Seniors help me,

I have analysed this application based upon the documents submitted by the applicant and the information contained in the file and make the following recommendation. General results: medicals required for all applicants--- Dependent 1. ----Not medically examined -----Dependent 2----- not medically examined principle applicant currently holds valid status in Canada. Spouse and dependents appear to be residing abroad; no previous history indicated in FOSS.ADDITIONAL NOTES: Previous CEC APPLICATION refused two times for language. Civil status: pa married spouse and dependent are not accompanying.
Work Experience: CEC qualifying period is from 05 MARCH 2011 TO 4March 2014 dates of authorized work experience – within ‘qualifying period' – in skill level 0, A or B Occupation: Since 15july2006 category of work permit: Religious worker post secondary studies in Canada – none according to schedule 8: work experience1: 15oct 2006 to lock in, NOC4217 selected, full time Religious worker with xxx temple. Employment letters dated 26 Jan and 20may2014 confirms date of employment, position title and a salary of $550 /month plus expenses LOE/ Supporting DOCS appear to match lead statement and a substantial number of the main duties under NOC CODE SELECTED.A T4 from 2013 show reported earnings $10.2k . A T4 from 2012 show reported earnings of $9.2k. A NOA from 2012show reported earnings of27.9K. Offer of Employment dated 18may2014- on file WEB- based search conducted- webpage not found. Online location not confirmed. Review Required. Additional notes : on the previous application pa declared NOC 4154 Professional occupation in religion , under skill level A. On the current application PA is calming work experience with same employer under NOC4217 OTHER RELIGIOUS OCCUPATION, skill level B for which he meet the language benchmarks. Explanation letter on the file dated 27 Jan 2014 indicated that PA selected the wrong NOC CODE 4154 on the previous application. For officer Review Language: IELTS submitted- applicants meets benchmarks for work experience at this skill level: B. CRIMINALITYA:- RCMP screening : Fingerprints received. RCMP RCMP fingerprints on file dated16may 2014- No association with criminal Record- police certificate: India No reportable trace
REVIEW REQUIRED BY Officer

Thanks

 

[jes_ON]

so it means i need to provide some details for the roles & responsibility incase VO doenot look into the petition which i have submitted and asks for more details. The point is should i wait for VO to respond or send it upfront.

Anything that deviates from the basic program requirements will require review by a senior VO, and this happens for a lot of applications. In this case, your letter of employment did not have job duties. Your alternative documents will probably be examined in the next review.

 

[saja_roy]

Anything that deviates from the basic program requirements will require review by a senior VO, and this happens for a lot of applications. In this case, your letter of employment did not have job duties. Your alternative documents will probably be examined in the next review.

Dear Wssun and Jes_on

Thanks a lot for providing your inputs. really appriciate you guys. This forum is full of great peoples like you.

since the employement letter does not provide information about duties where as my petition for work permit has details of my roles and responsibilities which was filed by my company while requesting for my ICT work permit. I have already mentioned about this in my covering letter while submitting for PR. This document i have already submitted and has nothing else which i can provide since i have left the company 5 months back. At this point is it seems like the VO has seen only the employement letter not the supporting petition. The next VO might take a look on the petition and take a decision. I am thinking this based on the GCMS notes where my file(physical file) is transfered from CIO to CPC-ottawa due to eligibility. its mentioned like file transfer reason eligibility in the GCMS notes.