shankster87 said:
Wait, what? How do you expect CIC to give you a timeline when they absolutely have no idea how much of the required documentation you already have or don't have or if you are even qualified when you started or "thought" about starting the process? And, "...most likely just several days..." doesn't sound at all like a substantiated claim. Not even sure how you came up with that. The website clearly says the 6 month clock starts "Once you have submitted a complete application package." The only timeline they have under full control is from when you submit a completed application. Only at that point is the ball in their court. I don't know if they had a precise timeline to give back when you started the process because the whole Express Entry program had just begun and the sample set was too small to even sample or look at patterns. If you took the 6 month timeline as your bible to set your priorities, I am sorry to say but that's completely on you. You have to give credit where credit is due. The CIC website is an excellent source of excellent information and in my experience so far, I think CIC is doing an excellent job with the Express Entry program. I especially think the CIC website does a superb job at not having "hidden fine print". Do I wish a few changes like them accepting PCC from FBI approved third parties? Sure as hell, I do! But, again, credits where credits are due.
Thanks for the detailed post. Ok, let's go one by one here:
1. I expect them to give a timeline because the application process is more about them managing their bottlenecks than me collecting documents and preparing my application.
2. I know that there are huge voids between any movements during the processing because I have seen quite a few GCMS notes (for which I give a huge credit to the Canadian government by the way. Not every government has the guts to deal which such level of exposure.)
3. 6 months from submitting a "complete application package" is a very debatable language, which we have seen to be exploited in some cases with applications being rejected as incomplete after 3-4 months of wait. So you never actually know with confidence that the ball is in their court.
4. I know this was a new program and that there was a certain risk involved. I just hoped their intent was going to be to make it work at all costs. And I hoped that whatever mistakes happen were going to be out of their control and they would do their best to make it up. Now after listening to remarks and not seeing significant movement in the months of November and December as well as some ironic rejections I am not as confident in their intent any more.
5. I am not taking anything as a bible (except for the actual bible..lol). Promises are promises and when someone makes a claim you expect them to keep at a certain confidence level. It is better to promise less and over perform than promise the world and underperform.
6. I do give credit to their immigration program as intended as well as to certain aspects of the process (including GCMS notes, CSE, and now extinct ECAS). Some processes really suck though (like no call center updates before 6 months, the whole mycic, which gets updated when it is too late and their non-compliance to their declared processes). I don't blame them for the FBI thing though cuz its the US who screws it up here. I mean what country issues a police certificate for 4 strait months..lol?
Thanks again for the discussion