Ray of Hope 66th Draw
- Thread starter arunroy007
- Start date
question is whether one gets CRS points for the same....CIC mandates that ECA has to be completed and if the evaluation says 'the qualification is equivalent to a (Canadian) post secondary education at an unrecognized institution'...I don't think with that evaluation report CIC will award points for such qualification...
if your son has got points for same,I too am happy for him...
if the one who asked gets score for same also I'd be happy...I was just sharing my assessment of the matter....
Hi guys, I need to submit a Statutory Declaration of Common-Law. Do we have to get it signed by a commissioner of oath?
Nope not yet updated in mine. They've said they have only started updating it now.
Then Is it going to drop after the next draw ? When are we to expect or fear the downwards trend ending ? Its almost half year, i have noticed in 2015 and 2016 the score trends upward after july.....
I feel the same that IRCC will issue limited ITAs from now on. They have issued almost 50k Invites this year. Downward trend from now on looks too good to be true
my sons ECA they have mentioned institution status Recognized .remarks.the program was taught at the London school of business and finance which is a non recognized institution. Awarded by university of wales
I also believe IRC going to fix number of ITA's going forward. that is why they have to release a news regarding 'tie' points and profile creation date priority.. earlier they would have selected everyone in the draw points , even if it is couple of hundreds more..
BUT don't loose hope as per the recent CRS distribution data , only about 6000+ profiles are above 400.. so slowly points will drop..
We have also take note that, many who were waiting on side lines on deciding where to migrate are now getting ready attempting IELTS/ECA and hoping now they can reach in 400-420+ range.. We would see many more new profiles getting added from now on..
These are my assumptions, and i would happily get beaten by CIC with scores dropping less than 400.. But my point is, just do not hope for scores to drop dramatic like before, since competition is very high in 380-420+ range than a 450+ range.
BUT don't loose hope as per the recent CRS distribution data , only about 6000+ profiles are above 400.. so slowly points will drop..
We have also take note that, many who were waiting on side lines on deciding where to migrate are now getting ready attempting IELTS/ECA and hoping now they can reach in 400-420+ range.. We would see many more new profiles getting added from now on..
These are my assumptions, and i would happily get beaten by CIC with scores dropping less than 400.. But my point is, just do not hope for scores to drop dramatic like before, since competition is very high in 380-420+ range than a 450+ range.
andieangel
Champion Member
The time stamp throws a whole new set of possibilities.
1. As the points drop, the # of candidates in each point would increase and thus CIC would have to compulsorily draw higher number for a cut off points and the draw size may increase beyond 4K. So to restrict the draw size with the falling points scenario, CIC would differentiate basis seniority (Time stamp). So CIC expects that the points will have to be dropped to meet the quota.
2. The rejection rate of candidates who have received ITA is very high this year, one of the reasons being multiple profiles. I cant say to what extent, but this would dissuade people from having multiple profile created as the newer profile might not get an invitation, which is anyway a wasted ITA. Although this would only work in the 400 - 420 zone, as I think people more than that would anyway get invited multiple times due to higher points. Thus CIC is trying to drive some sort of discipline among the candidates.
3. However, this complicates the OINP situation. If you recreate a profile for OINP, you might get a nomination but not necessarily an ITA. So either OINP will have to drop the new profile clause and dip in the pool, which is a good thing for the existing profiles, or drop the 400 points barrier.
So CIC has again added an unknown parameter in the equation and there goes all the speculations and calculations out of the window. However, I strongly feel that the points are gonna fall and the draw size would hover around 3.5K - 3.8K.
1. As the points drop, the # of candidates in each point would increase and thus CIC would have to compulsorily draw higher number for a cut off points and the draw size may increase beyond 4K. So to restrict the draw size with the falling points scenario, CIC would differentiate basis seniority (Time stamp). So CIC expects that the points will have to be dropped to meet the quota.
2. The rejection rate of candidates who have received ITA is very high this year, one of the reasons being multiple profiles. I cant say to what extent, but this would dissuade people from having multiple profile created as the newer profile might not get an invitation, which is anyway a wasted ITA. Although this would only work in the 400 - 420 zone, as I think people more than that would anyway get invited multiple times due to higher points. Thus CIC is trying to drive some sort of discipline among the candidates.
3. However, this complicates the OINP situation. If you recreate a profile for OINP, you might get a nomination but not necessarily an ITA. So either OINP will have to drop the new profile clause and dip in the pool, which is a good thing for the existing profiles, or drop the 400 points barrier.
So CIC has again added an unknown parameter in the equation and there goes all the speculations and calculations out of the window. However, I strongly feel that the points are gonna fall and the draw size would hover around 3.5K - 3.8K.
In point 2, by rejection rate you mean the ITA decline rate or the application rejection rate?