Prats6 said:
Last was a disgusting draw. I really want CIC (or IRCC) to come out and spell their priorities. If PNPs are the only way to go, let them make it clear so that people aren't in a limbo. When I did think about immigration, I had 2 choices, Oz and Canada - Canada seemed a friendlier and better place to go, with the education system there. But this year has been bad and this Govt. if anything is doing worse than the last one. Really like the personality of the PM but the policies seem a bit shallow.
Just bloody come out with your projections. And No, I don't want to go on a PNP to SK (which I did not apply, even though was eligible) and be stuck without a job or do a survival job. I really want to be in Canada but the turn of events have really turned me off. Here's hoping it becomes better next year. Also, I have stopped checking the forums as it the scores and numbers seemed to have lost relevance. I am on 460, but imagine the plight of people stuck on 480.. God, sounds awful!
I do not know your NOC, but the funny thing is that especially in the most wanted province like Ontario and British Columbia there is really high competition. Many native graduates were not able to find job over there.
So having opened choices does not mean that you will not end up on survival jobs at the start.
Canada is just doing what is favourable for them and that means to fill in the gaps in the areas where the gaps are (in less wanted provinces or specific specialisations).
From all those nice chats in videos I have seen one, where some statistics was given.
Canada takes in between 260 -300k immigrants per year (but that is for all types).
Around 45% are economic immigrants (so minus family, refugees and international students).
Here it was not clear if in those 45% are also people on so temporary work permits.
But lets say for the sake of calculation that they will take 120k economic migrants. However here I am guessing that they count every member of the family as economics.
Now let me assume that average applicant has 1 additional person. That would just give us 60000 invitations per year.
And again from these 60k there is some portion that does not use EE system (nominations under old FSW system, business starters...) that does cut the number down to further 30%.
So what is left at the end are like 40k invitations per EE entry. And those invitations do include around 60-70% of people that have either PNP or LMIA.
So that gives like 14K free tickets per year for economic migrants without additional 600 points.
Now you can check statistics of amount of people in each point group in the EE system in order to have idea of the chances to be nominated.
And if ever they do decide to increase different group (for example family or refugees), they do automaticaly cut down on these free nominations.
So with this calcualtion the logic is clear, PNP or LMIA is practicaly needed in order to go with the system fast.
The past with lower points will not repeat, since people are already familiar with the system and they tried to max their points with all possible ways (language tests for example).
I would predict for current trend for people to hunt down the second language in order to get those few missing points or to get with still opened PNP.
So within a year or so we will have increase of bilinguals.