Now you must realise that it did make sense back then.how does this make any sense?
Last draw 471 with tie break in May 2019, if it goes like this cutoff will hover above 470 for few draws for sure.good part is tie breaking of Jan 30 2020. That means all pool is over now? in last draw it was of May 2019
The positive thing is that the pace of new candidates having 450+ has been slowed down. Previously the number of candidates entering the pool was higher than the draw size and that was the major factor pool size kept on increasing despite frequent draws.Same state. I am at 467 and received OINP. Will wait till next week. If no B2B draw, OINP will be the way to go.
Yeah, I actually recalculated my numbers and actually the number of candidates/day has not been reduced.come on....finding an excuse to comfort doesn't work...the point will only go up and maintain 470+
No, dude. It has not slowed down at all. 3061 candidates either joined or increased their score to a minimum of 472 (but not more than 600) since last draw. The number of candidates with scores above 451 but below 470 doesn't matter as they will be stuck until the 470+ (472 to be precise) are cleared out. Think about this, 3061 candidates had scores higher than 472 and they all were probably new.The positive thing is that the pace of new candidates having 450+ has been slowed down. Previously the number of candidates entering the pool was higher than the draw size and that was the major factor pool size kept on increasing despite frequent draws.
Stay positive and hope we will see the score in 460s in March and April.
its still higher.You are miscalculating just like i did onceThe positive thing is that the pace of new candidates having 450+ has been slowed down. Previously the number of candidates entering the pool was higher than the draw size and that was the major factor pool size kept on increasing despite frequent draws.
Stay positive and hope we will see the score in 460s in March and April.
Do you know it was much more during the past few months? At least we have reached the breakeven point where the number of high scoring candidates is adding up at the same pace as the number of ITAs. If this reduction will continue, you will see the score dropping down in the future.No, dude. It has not slowed down at all. 3061 candidates either joined or increased their score to a minimum of 472 (but not more than 600) since last draw. The number of candidates with scores above 451 but below 470 doesn't matter as they will be stuck until the 470+ (472 to be precise) are cleared out. Think about this, 3061 candidates had scores higher than 472 and they all were probably new.
I am maintaining the pool count since October 19 and I am pretty sure about my calculations.its still higher.You are miscalculating just like i did once
It's simple math. There were 10k candidates in the pool with 450+ score in Ocotber. Pool size of 450+ increased from 10k to 20k because the inflow of applicants was more than the ITAs issued, however, if you see the pool table of last two draws, there is roughly a change of 100 candidates in 450+ tier which means that almost 3500 profiles are added in between the two draws. If the pace further slows down and the number of ITAs remain same, CRS is bound to drop in the future.I am maintaining the pool count since October 19 and I am pretty sure about my calculations.
Further, I am an Accountant with hands-on exposure to number crunching.
Really? 2622 candidates had a score of 471 and above (but less than 600) in the last draw (136th, Jan 22)Y
Do you know it was much more during the past few months? At least we have reached the breakeven point where the number of high scoring candidates is adding up at the same pace as the number of ITAs. If this reduction will continue, you will see the score dropping down in the future.