Don't spread any fake hope, the ITA target is only 81400 this year and 59800 already issued ~ which mean only
21600 ITA left this year (21600 / 3600 ITA = 6 draws left) I think they will conduct 1-2 more draw but that's it....no reason for b2b draw again and ita increase
They are 5100 ITA ahead compare to last year. As long as they meet the annual target of 81400, they are good to go and enjoy their Christmas break.
They can choose to invite more but not required.
Okay. I just un-ignored you, because someone just talked about you posting a factual analysis.
Now let's get this clear. I didn't ignore you because I am a narrow minded person, rather because you do not know how to get your point across and because you often behave like a 'Schadenfreude' (someone who derives pleasure from the sufferings of other). And also because you are never up to a reasonable discussion.
But nevermind, let's get to the point, since you seem to be resorting to facts now.
Firstly, I do appreciate this analysis. It is well noted. The calculations are fine. But you seem to have made one huge mistake while considering the variables. You have mistakenly took the figure so mentioned in the annual target as the number of invitations to be handed out in an year. And that's why your analysis is flawed.
If you would check the heading of the data chart from where you borrowed this figure of 81400, you 'd realise that it talks about 'IMMIGRATION LEVELS' and not 'invitations to be issued'. Now I don't need to bring out definitions to explain to you the difference between immigration levels and invitations, right?
So tell me, how did you account for the leakages i.e the wasted ITAs? Since the target talks about 'immigration' and since a certain percentage of invitations are bound to be wasted, on account of incomplete applications, non acceptance of ITA, or refusals, tell us, how have you adjusted those against the annual target?
Secondly, you have deliberately focused only on the 'mid target' for 2019. You have chosen to ignore, that a figure of 86000 too exists on the higher end, and if CIC goes by that (which it may, given the fact that it issued 89000 ITAs against a target of 76000 in 2018), then it is somewhat behind its target.
Now I am not saying that the assumption that CIC will issue 90000+ invitations this year is bound to be correct, it may well be off, but your assumption that it may stick to 81400 only, is also not bound to be correct, and most certainly will not be (as explained in my two points above).
Anyway, kudos to you for bringing out an analysis. But next time you do, try to do it in an unbiased fashion and be open to corrections.
Regards.
P.S - You actually seem like a nice person, and I don't want to get into an unnecessary online feud. So why not cut the negativity and be a bit more understanding and helpful.