So I called the AINP office asked them if PGWP holders were eligible under their new rules, they let me know that its just the TFW whose work permits are expiring this April 2015.
Did they mention if they will process the applications for people whose PGWP are expiring soon faster? I think the email or presentation had something like that on there for TFW.flavdcosta said:So I called the AINP office asked them if PGWP holders were eligible under their new rules, they let me know that its just the TFW whose work permits are expiring this April 2015.
No he just said its for the TFW whose 4 year work permit is expiring in April 2015.EEdreams15 said:Did they mention if they will process the applications for people whose PGWP are expiring soon faster? I think the email or presentation had something like that on there for TFW.
Those rules are only for TFW....If you don't know who belongs to that group read: http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/media/backgrounders/2011/2011-03-24.aspEEdreams15 said:Did they mention if they will process the applications for people whose PGWP are expiring soon faster? I think the email or presentation had something like that on there for TFW.
This is so confusing. And no official updates. Crazy. And who is getting those nominations??elisha79 said:What are criteria for this new rule???my 4 yr cap is 2016 but my wp permit expire by june2015..so I'm eligible???
Wow. I am shocked by the stupidity of people in the government. They have no right to talk about fairness.mims2000 said:Just called up ainp. So the New Rule Only Applies To those Reaching 4 Year Cap even If Ur Work Permits Expire Within Feb- december 2015, no Hope.
Im just wondering if it was written in the leaked letter. Or did i miss it? i thought i saw light.. oh well. Better pack my things now.Phil89 said:Wow. I am shocked by the stupidity of people in the government. They have no right to talk about fairness.
The letter didn't say anything about 4 year cap. I think they just made the requirement up.mims2000 said:Im just wondering if it was written in the leaked letter. Or did i miss it? i thought i saw light.. oh well. Better pack my things now.
Guys don't be so naïve..It wasn't the lnfo leak. This is just the way they work. They don't think we deserve to get updatesEEdreams15 said:I am curious to know when, or should I say if, they will update the website.
I have a very bad feeling that the leak may have affected the rolling out of the program. :-\
Why cant they release the formal letter and stop beating around the bush. Theyre giving false hopePhil89 said:Guys don't be so naïve..It wasn't the lnfo leak. This is just the way they work. They don't think we deserve to get updates
If you follow Edmonton Journal, it says in the article that "The department did not make a public announcement because it wants to deal directly with TFW's who will qualify".mims2000 said:Why cant they release the formal letter and stop beating around the bush. Theyre giving false hope