Consider this possibility:Jhama said:I have found no reason which implies that inland is a better choice for me.
Outland seems to be a no-brainer, unless something significant happens to make me change my mind before the paperwork is actually submitted.
It's not so much a matter of whether a person without status `deserves' the Outland timeline, but rather how a person is supposed to decipher the information regarding if/how that Outland applicant is processed. As a matter of fact, an Inland applicant without status can sometimes have their application processed (to reach AIP) if CBSA requests it from CIC!jsrnm said:There is something I don't understand though. On both applications outland and inland it will state u were out of status what is the difference? I am 90% sure I am doing inland I don't believe I desreve this outland timeline
Of all of the thought that goes into my decisions on the matter.. "speed" is not one of them.Ponga said:While it's great that you are finally ready to resolve this matter, I'm not sure that choosing the `fastest way' (for those with status) will be well received by CIC.
US applications that require an interview are processed in LA. NY does not process family class applications anymore, and no interviews for spousal sponsorship are held there. Currently those requiring interviews with applications in LA are taking 12-16 months for total processing, which is still shorter than inland.Ponga said:Because of the overstay, YOUR application could be processed in NY which has a substantially longer processing time than even an Inland application. Further more, you could also be found to be inadmissible because of your overstay, which means that you cannot even land! And...you are the lucky recipient of an exclusion order that would ban you from entering Canada for at least 1 year.
So...would you recommend an American that has overstayed, and is out of status, to submit an Outland application?rhcohen2014 said:US applications that require an interview are processed in LA. NY does not process family class applications anymore, and no interviews for spousal sponsorship are held there. Currently those requiring interviews with applications in LA are taking 12-16 months for total processing, which is still shorter than inland.
also, i highly doubt CBSA would issue an exclusion order at landing once PR was approved. The whole fact the person applied for PR and received approval from CIC generally outweighs any previous issues. When I landed and had to answer yes to the question about being refused entry, the officer just looked at me, pointed to my COPR and said, "I don't even understand why they ask that question. this document cancels that out." So i don't think that needs to be a concern. I also doubt CBSA would pick up on the fact he previously overstayed if it was not already noted in their system. When you land as a pr, they don't really do a deep check on your entries, they assume CIC vetted and approved you.
I would definitely recommend outland. Because in the event the person is asked to leave, the outland application will continue processing.Ponga said:So...would you recommend an American that has overstayed, and is out of status, to submit an Outland application?
Personally, I'd still be reluctant simply because I have no idea how CBSA would respond if they are alerted (by CIC) that the applicant is out of status and has filed an Outland application.