New Delhi Applicant Must Watch this!!!!

[rutvi_143]

hi there!

i wanna share one shocking news with you all. one of my friend has applied for FSW NOC 0111 category. now, it has been more then 9 months he sent his documents to delhi and he hasn't receive any news from them. so he thought to drop one email to delhi. the reply he got is shocking............they have said:

Dear Sir/Madam,

This is in response to your recent enquiry to the Immigration Section of the Canadian High Commission in New Delhi.
Since you applied as a Federal Skilled Worker on or after February 27, 2008 and before June 26, 2010 , your application will take two years or more to be processed. This is due to the fact that Canada received over 425,000 applications under this program during this period. However, If you wish to withdraw your application, you may be eligible for a refund of your processing fees.
* Unfortunately, it will take longer to process federal skilled worker applications submitted under the first set of instructions (between February 27, 2008 and June 25, 2010) than originally projected.
* During this time, the department received applications for more than 425,000 people, and 144,000 of these have not yet received a decision.
* This number represents more than twice the number of projected admissions under the federal skilled worker program in 2011, so many of these applicants will have to wait two years or more to be processed.

We trust that this information will be of assistance.

It's shocking...plz share you thought on this...!!

 

[devilhimselff]

I think its old news.
Search the forum and you will see this being discussed.

 

[rutvi_143]

I think its old news.
Search the forum and you will see this being discussed.

it might be a old news..but new for me...could you share some more thought plz...as i m new in this forum...thanx!!

 

[devilhimselff]

Putting it simply, the new instruction/guidelines issued (For 2010/2011) are being prioritized.

Others are being put into the cold storage, with uncertain time frame.

 

[qorax]

it might be a old news..but new for me...could you share some more thought plz...as i m new in this forum...thanx!!

D-himself is right -- the issue has been discussed, in details, earlier under many threads. Here's the gist of it:

1. On 26/6/2010, the PR rules changed, drastically. The previous 'fast-track system' was superseded.
2. A new MI list came up, with 29 NOCs, which were [supposed] to be under 'demand' [vide HRSDC].
3. The new system 'also' REMOVED the 120 days letter stage; and now the complete docs submission was to CIO-NS.
4. CIC overseas offices were not in immediate sync with the policy changes. It took sometime to settle down.
5. Things started to go wary with most 'older' cases.
6. Then came 2011... Feb-Mar saw discussions between the CIC Minister & industry stalwarts.
7. Which revamped the CIC 'need' once again... the details r posted in the CIC website & their newsletters.
8. Hereon, CIC chose to 'prioritize' the 29 NOCs -- keeping the 'older' ones, who were not in that list, under abeyance.
9. Two separate processing queues were introduced... the "pre-26/6" & the "post-26/6".
10. RESULT? The 'pre-26/6' cases went to the backstage*, regretfully though !

Hope that cleared your contention.
Qorax

*These will see the light in 24-36 months.

 

[rutvi_143]

D-himself is right -- the issue has been discussed, in details, earlier under many threads. Here's the gist of it:

1. On 26/6/2010, the PR rules changed, drastically. The previous 'fast-track system' was superseded.
2. A new MI list came up, with 29 NOCs, which were [supposed] to be under 'demand' [vide HRSDC].
3. The new system 'also' REMOVED the 120 days letter stage; and now the complete docs submission was to CIO-NS.
4. CIC overseas offices were not in immediate sync with the policy changes. It took sometime to settle down.
5. Things started to go wary with most 'older' cases.
6. Then came 2011... Feb-Mar saw discussions between the CIC Minister & industry stalwarts.
7. Which revamped the CIC 'need' once again... the details r posted in the CIC website & their newsletters.
8. Hereon, CIC chose to 'prioritize' the 29 NOCs -- keeping the 'older' ones, who were not in that list, under abeyance.
9. Two separate processing queues were introduced... the "pre-26/6" & the "post-26/6".
10. RESULT? The 'pre-26/6' cases went to the backstage*, regretfully though !

Hope that cleared your contention.
Qorax

*These will see the light in 24-36 months.

thanx for ur information... seems like its never ending process now...dont know wht to do....

 

[Sans_May2010]

24 - 36 Months?

Any news on the next ministerial instructions?

Sans_May2010

]

*These will see the light in 24-36 months.

 

[sandz]

Hi Qorax ,

I am pre-june 2010 applicant . As our cases are getting delayed . Kindly let me know Can i send parallel applications i.e one in post-june category and second in new ministerial instructions that are expected to be in place post July 1.

Pls. inform Do CIC allows multiple applications ?

i will be thankful for your response.

D-himself is right -- the issue has been discussed, in details, earlier under many threads. Here's the gist of it:

1. On 26/6/2010, the PR rules changed, drastically. The previous 'fast-track system' was superseded.
2. A new MI list came up, with 29 NOCs, which were [supposed] to be under 'demand' [vide HRSDC].
3. The new system 'also' REMOVED the 120 days letter stage; and now the complete docs submission was to CIO-NS.
4. CIC overseas offices were not in immediate sync with the policy changes. It took sometime to settle down.
5. Things started to go wary with most 'older' cases.
6. Then came 2011... Feb-Mar saw discussions between the CIC Minister & industry stalwarts.
7. Which revamped the CIC 'need' once again... the details r posted in the CIC website & their newsletters.
8. Hereon, CIC chose to 'prioritize' the 29 NOCs -- keeping the 'older' ones, who were not in that list, under abeyance.
9. Two separate processing queues were introduced... the "pre-26/6" & the "post-26/6".
10. RESULT? The 'pre-26/6' cases went to the backstage*, regretfully though !

Hope that cleared your contention.
Qorax

*These will see the light in 24-36 months.

 

[pb55]

D-himself is right -- the issue has been discussed, in details, earlier under many threads. Here's the gist of it:

1. On 26/6/2010, the PR rules changed, drastically. The previous 'fast-track system' was superseded.
2. A new MI list came up, with 29 NOCs, which were [supposed] to be under 'demand' [vide HRSDC].
3. The new system 'also' REMOVED the 120 days letter stage; and now the complete docs submission was to CIO-NS.
4. CIC overseas offices were not in immediate sync with the policy changes. It took sometime to settle down.
5. Things started to go wary with most 'older' cases.
6. Then came 2011... Feb-Mar saw discussions between the CIC Minister & industry stalwarts.
7. Which revamped the CIC 'need' once again... the details r posted in the CIC website & their newsletters.
8. Hereon, CIC chose to 'prioritize' the 29 NOCs -- keeping the 'older' ones, who were not in that list, under abeyance.
9. Two separate processing queues were introduced... the "pre-26/6" & the "post-26/6".
10. RESULT? The 'pre-26/6' cases went to the backstage*, regretfully though !

Hope that cleared your contention.
Qorax

*These will see the light in 24-36 months.

In nutshell one blunder after another ....... and the poor applicants continue to suffer...endlessly. ???

Just wondering if they need rocket scientists to sort out the mess.

Any rocket scientists on the forum who want to volunteer?

 

[pb55]

hi there!

i wanna share one shocking news ..........................
....144,000 of these have not yet received a decision.
* This number represents more than twice the number of projected admissions under the federal skilled worker program in 2011, so many of these applicants will have to wait two years or more to be processed.

We trust that this information will be of assistance.

It's shocking...plz share you thought on this...!!

Let me share my thoughts..... and show your friend some silver linning on the dark clouds.

Going by the letter's logic the most current Ministerial instructions are in demand and the MI btw feb2008-june2010 are no more in-demand (just like pre-feb 2008 cases) and should have logically then be placed at the end of the backlog of Pre-feb2008 who have been waiting for more that 7 years..... yes 7 years+

Since they are not rocket scientists they cannot figure that out and will still process applicants btw feb2008-june2010 before the pre-feb2008 cases.

 

[qorax]

Hi Qorax ,

I am pre-june 2010 applicant . As our cases are getting delayed . Kindly let me know Can i send parallel applications i.e one in post-june category and second in new ministerial instructions that are expected to be in place post July 1.

Pls. inform Do CIC allows multiple applications ?

i will be thankful for your response.

Yes, u can, if u stand eligible under the new rules... multiple concurrent apps r acceptable.
Qorax

 

[vinay push]

Qorax,
And what about those applicants in pre 26/6, wo are submitted Passports and Medicals, IS CH gonna hold their PP 7-8 months more,,,
Regards
Vinay

 

[qorax]

Qorax,
And what about those applicants in pre 26/6, wo are submitted Passports and Medicals, IS CH gonna hold their PP 7-8 months more,,,
Regards
Vinay

Nope.
The disparity comes to an end with the meds - unless a security red-flag crops-up.

Qorax

 

[gurdeep23]

Hi Qorax,
Just want to know that what is the maximum time taken by CHC delhi to send back the passports after stamping visa.Does this 2 yr wait will apply to the candiates who have send their pps to chc delhi.pls tell me.

 

[rsb2010]

Hi Qorax,
Just want to know that what is the maximum time taken by CHC delhi to send back the passports after stamping visa.Does this 2 yr wait will apply to the candiates who have send their pps to chc delhi.pls tell me.

read Qorax's previous quote again for your IInd question. (No. Disparity ends once you'hv received your medicals)