Yeah - I have to side with Sehar. I found that comment shockingly offensive as well when I originally read it.
I thought I was the only one that found it to be very offensive. I'm glad I'm not.scylla said:Yeah - I have to side with Sehar. I found that comment shockingly offensive as well when I originally read it.
I could not have said it better myself! - Completely agree with the above post. Give Charlotte a break - she has shared so much and inspired so many.ultimate_mr_universe said:Dear All intelligent, intellectual, emotionally sensitive people...as a regular reader of this forum I would just like to say that Charlotte has all the rights to express her emotions and feelings in this forum as a founder of this forum and I think we should support and allow her to to do so in the future as well. Personally I look at this forum as a journey of her in Toronto( about which I am definitely interested in) which I found reading interesting and helpful. Instead of underlying and srutinizing her posts, I think we should just let her go with the flow and allow her to reach her own conclusions. Everyone has the rights to form his or her opinion and than change it later on. Its completely normal and I would just say its human nature. Ofcourse anyone who disagress with her can always comment and stop reading at this forum and may create a different forum of his or hers, as you all are very capable. But for me, I am reading here because of Charlotte and not because of anyone else and how they feel and would not like to see this going in different direction.....Dear CJ hope to hear more from you......
I am also of the same opinion as of ultimate_mr_universe.ultimate_mr_universe said:Dear All intelligent, intellectual, emotionally sensitive people...as a regular reader of this forum I would just like to say that Charlotte has all the rights to express her emotions and feelings in this forum as a founder of this forum and I think we should support and allow her to to do so in the future as well. Personally I look at this forum as a journey of her in Toronto( about which I am definitely interested in) which I found reading interesting and helpful. Instead of underlying and srutinizing her posts, I think we should just let her go with the flow and allow her to reach her own conclusions. Everyone has the rights to form his or her opinion and than change it later on. Its completely normal and I would just say its human nature. Ofcourse anyone who disagress with her can always comment and stop reading at this forum and may create a different forum of his or hers, as you all are very capable. But for me, I am reading here because of Charlotte and not because of anyone else and how they feel and would not like to see this going in different direction.....Dear CJ hope to hear more from you......
buddy - you made my day...Canada is never a “Banana Republic”. It doesn't produce bananas. BC nectarines and blackberries are very good btw!
Lol yes.clubcanada said:@ steaky:
buddy - you made my day...
This is one of those reare cases where I agree with CJ as canada is indeed a "banana republic". everyone who's been job hunting as a recent landed immigrant in canada probably would agree...
am in with you with regard to this. Two kids, no job here, no proper safety net available for some time to be established here and all that stress of losing money while having no job and two kids to maintain, will be a bit too much. Think twice before moving here.
Denmark is not such a bad place although I know they can be quite tough to allow you become really one of their own but at least you have a life there and your kids can grow up nicely and have an almost free education at great universities, after all, Lund in Sweden is not that far away and allow them to study there and then decided whether to move here or not.
it doesnt have to be brought into context with an unstable government nor mono-agricultural exports.Except Canada is by no means a "banana republic". A banana republic refers to an unstable govt, usually propped up by a single agricultural export. None of this applies remotely to Canada.
Canada qualifiesclubcanada said:it doesnt have to be brought into context with an unstable government nor mono-agricultural exports.
'banana republic' is also being used to describe a regime or procedure lacking transparency in the decision making process and/or a system which is based on nepotism favoring personal relationships/buddy network over any objective criteria.
So as Australia, France, Greece, Romania, India, Ireland, Sri Lanka, Spain, United Kingdom, USA (according to Wiki!)Baloo said:Canada qualifies
That may be so, but in Canada nepotism seems to be a national sport...steaky said:So as Australia, France, Greece, Romania, India, Ireland, Sri Lanka, Spain, United Kingdom, USA (according to Wiki!)
You are no better than the people who discriminated against you. I thought you are different.CharlotteJ said:This is Canada... if you can survive it, you do. I won't ...I can't survive this and I long to a place with a real history, a soul and a spirit and people who may not be that friendly like me, but believe me, those who do discriminated me and I met were mostly those from Eastern European countries!!!!
Next time I hire, when I have a similar job in the Netherlands, you bet I won't hire anybody from those places I 've seen here who treated me like trash!
But I shall hire people from India, China, Philippines and a few other nations that I met and were oh so kind to me and are so kind to me to this day.