EasyRider said:
"Passport of convenience" is a b.s. theory. In reality, you cannot do much with a passport outside-- you lose all benefits:
- you're not qualified for free healthcare
- you're not qualified to receive employment insurance outside of Canada
- I'm not sure if you're qualified for pension from outside of Canada, but the pension would be a joke if you haven't lived in Canada for a long time
And still all the major useless abusers are currently living INSIDE Canada, sitting on welfare and/or some other types of govt. assistance or scam is some ghetto.
Issues like Lebanon evacuation in 2006 was a screw up by the Canadian government completely, and it's not going to repeat failures like this anymore because, normally, country is not supposed to provide assistance to dual-citizens in their other country of citizenship, only in third countries. Canadian government was rightfully publicly criticized for that multiple times.
So, I don't think government is concerned about "abuse" from those who leave as in reality there's no any, rather it's simply jealous because Canadian passport puts a person on a world map, gives access to the world and makes one competitive. It's jealousy to the smart and capable.
I have read each and every word of your above text. You have contradicted yourself.
In one line you have said "Passport of convenience is a b.s. theory." and in another line you have said "because Canadian passport puts a person on a world map, gives access to the world and makes one competitive."
How Canadian passport puts you on world map? If yes, people use Canadian passport as convenience to be on world map. If No, then people put themselves on world map through their skills and experience and get a job.
How Canadian passport makes you competitive? If yes, people use Canadian passport as convenience to be competitive. If No, your competitiveness is through your skills and experience.
Then you mentioned that "It's jealousy to the smart and capable." If someone is smart and capable, he/she does not need Canadian passport to prove his/her smartness and/or capability.
To answer your question on pension, one has to live in Canada for at least 10 years after the age of 18. If someone is born in Canada and lives in Canada for 17 years and then leaves and come back at the age of 65, he/she is ineligible for Canadian Pension.
Well, you mentioned your viewpoint and I mentioned mine. Now, Government does not make policies based on any individual's viewpoint. They have to look at broader picture. First of all, any Government does not want its citizens to be living and working abroad, but live in their country of citizenship and paying taxes. At the same time they do not want to restrict any citizen from going abroad to live. We are in a democracy. Right?
If Government sees that a lot of Canadian Citizens live abroad right after getting their citizenships, Government has a right to investigate and tighten their laws on citizenship. Remember Canadian Citizenship is not a right of an immigrant, but a grant. What if a lot of Canadian Citizens leave Canada, who is going to live and work here? Government will have a shortfall in taxes that in turn will leave rest of Canadians in even higher taxes. Immigration numbers will rise. Government will need more immigrants per year to make up for the shortfall in workforce.
You and I are sitting in Canada and debating about it because almost 7 million Canadian working people will retire (baby boomers) from workforce between 2012 and 2030. Otherwise, why Canada would have been opened doors to immigration. Government makes policies for future analyzing current and past trends.
Who is going to get Canadian immigration or Canadian Citizenship, if they declare in application that they want to be in Canada for few years and then leave with Canadian Passport to be on world map, access the world, and be competitive like you mentioned in your comments above.