Moving out from Quebec for faster Spousal Sponsorship

[ImmSen]

I have been hearing reports from immigration consultants and lawyer and I believe some posts on this forum that many provinces are getting more strict about PNP applicants and whether they remain in Canada. Quebec has always been an issue although more of an issue now as they try to reduce volume of newcomers and they know people are trying to avoid processing times and program pauses. There is no point of being in control of your immigration if a large portion approved in the rest of Canada move to Quebec right after they get PR. We are in a new age of enforcement and with limited quotas provinces will want to ensure that people approved remain and contribute to their province at least initially.

In other words: you have no serious, reliable, trustworthy, verifiable sources that anyone can verify. Can you tell me the names of the supposed immigration consultants and lawyers you claim to have been hearing reports from?

And yes, actually friends are a good source for what I claim: since they would have done it, and are living proof. while you cannot even link a post on this website to ascertain your claim, and the previous link to RAMQ you posted actually disprove your claim about CSQ being always a necessity in orde to get the RAMQ.

OK!

 

[Bornlucky]

I have been hearing reports from immigration consultants and lawyer and I believe some posts on this forum that many provinces are getting more strict about PNP applicants and whether they remain in Canada. Quebec has always been an issue although more of an issue now as they try to reduce volume of newcomers and they know people are trying to avoid processing times and program pauses. There is no point of being in control of your immigration if a large portion approved in the rest of Canada move to Quebec right after they get PR. We are in a new age of enforcement and with limited quotas provinces will want to ensure that people approved remain and contribute to their province at least initially.

You hear, "reports from consultants and lawyer?"

So, you don't have any sources.

You mislead people with your cooked up theories.

 

[ImmSen]

You hear, "reports from consultants and lawyer?"

So, you don't have any sources.

You mislead people with your cooked up theories.

Exactly, also this person doesn't seem to have any ongoing case that would warrant them being so active here, from analyzing their post: they are just answering on situations/cases but never asking anything for themselves. And they have been responding to my comments very quickly (like that's all they have to do). Besides their profile indicates they have a ton of comments on this forum that are all on different streams and cases of immigration: like this is ALL that they do. And they are neither an immigration lawyer nor an immigration consultant!!!

My bet is that it's someone in their basement with NO life who is bored and maybe feeling some kind of psychological pathology just giving themselves importance by fear mongering vulnerable people on these forums. A little bit like cat fisher but instead of deriving a sense of self worth by pretending to be someone they are not, they derive importance by impressing themselves with the fear and interest they can generate on many of the people here who may not have the tools or serenity to see through their deceitful agenda.

 

[armoured]

Quebec has always been an issue although more of an issue now as they try to reduce volume of newcomers and they know people are trying to avoid processing times and program pauses. There is no point of being in control of your immigration if a large portion approved in the rest of Canada move to Quebec right after they get PR. We are in a new age of enforcement and with limited quotas provinces will want to ensure that people approved remain and contribute to their province at least initially.

This may be logical but be upfront: it sounds like you have no evidence, even hearsay, about any specific Quebec actions with respect to spouse sponsorship cases subsequently moving to Quebec.

It's okay to warn people that POTENTIALLY there could be a problem, IF Quebec decided to do something about it.

But it's most certainly not the same as evidence of any such thing actually happening.

 

[ImmSen]

This may be logical but be upfront: it sounds like you have no evidence, even hearsay, about any specific Quebec actions with respect to spouse sponsorship cases subsequently moving to Quebec.

It's okay to warn people that POTENTIALLY there could be a problem, IF Quebec decided to do something about it.

But it's most certainly not the same as evidence of any such thing actually happening.

I think I see you: It seems what you are doing is: you are trying to lend some credibility and good will to canuck78 by giving them a slap on the wrist (so showing you agree with those calling him to gain their trust, so that then you can re-activate the fear mongering). Smart manipulation. But I see through it.

it is unredeemable what they have asserted and their behavior on the forum is also unredeemable.

And no: it's not ok to warn people on things that are not even remotely possible. There is nothing Quebec can do against PR who the day after they get their pr decide to come live in Quebec. PR can live anywhere in canada. That's law.

It seems you are part of the couple of account on here that are trolls: trying to get credibility by posting some truth so that then your lies are more believable and less likely to be fact-checked.

Infoseeker12 quoted you in another thread as having done your research along with canuck78, who has gone silent.

I think you could very well be the same person for all three accounts. And right now: the attention I am giving you by engaging with you must feel like absolute Christmas.

The only reason I do so is because I want others to be warned. So they don't worry at your merci.