more immigrants in next 5 years

[fatani]

http://www.cicnews.com/2016/10/canada-needs-immigration-to-balance-aging-population-108568.html

 

[fatani]

I want all of you out here to shed some light on it. What are you guys think about it

 

[kryt0n]

It's a prediction. It might happen. A new government may also cut figures.

 

[fatani]

http://www.cicnews.com/2016/10/government-advisory-group-recommends-massive-increase-canadian-immigration-108601.html

And on this also 450,000 a year in coming 5 years

 

[kryt0n]

It's the same website reporting figures from a study. The website is for a consultancy company to get customers to use them to get to Canada. They aren't going to report many stories about how Canada is going to stop immigration.

If you can link it to a story published by the Canadian government, we can discuss it.

 

[fatani]

It's the same website reporting figures from a study. The website is for a consultancy company to get customers to use them to get to Canada. They aren't going to report many stories about how Canada is going to stop immigration.

If you can link it to a story published by the Canadian government, we can discuss it.

But there reasons are logical so we can take some encouragement from it.

 

[kryt0n]

But there reasons are logical so we can take some encouragement from it.

*Their

But sure, it's great prediction. But it could also be cherry picking. There could be 10 anti immigration reports for every positive immigration reports.

 

[DelPiero07]

They have their own agenda, like kryt0n said, unless it is something official there is no point discussing it.

Cheers

 

[Alexios07]

It's the same website reporting figures from a study. The website is for a consultancy company to get customers to use them to get to Canada. They aren't going to report many stories about how Canada is going to stop immigration.

If you can link it to a story published by the Canadian government, we can discuss it.

CICNews and this forum are managed by the same law firm.

The 50% (450,000) is just a recommendation for the Government from an Economic committee:

http://www.budget.gc.ca/aceg-ccce/home-accueil-en.html
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/immigration-system-increase-mccallum-1.3812749

I personally think it's a pretty stupid recommendation. The more immigrants we bring in, the lower the median salary will be. 300k / year is a good enough quota.

Employers always want to pay the least salaries to workers, and new immigrants usually accept a pay cut to get the first jobs in Canada.

 

[fatani]

CICNews and this forum are managed by the same law firm.

The 50% (450,000) is just a recommendation for the Government from an Economic committee:

http://www.budget.gc.ca/aceg-ccce/home-accueil-en.html
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/immigration-system-increase-mccallum-1.3812749

I personally think it's a pretty stupid recommendation. The more immigrants we bring in, the lower the median salary will be. 300k / year is a good enough quota.

Employers always want to pay the least salaries to workers, and new immigrants usually accept a pay cut to get the first jobs in Canada.

Minister said that in the near future this will not happen the number is to high. But he said it that in near future the numbers will increase so we can expect 20-25% increase in next 5 years because you just cant shut on shop with recommandations

 

[thestunner316]

CICNews and this forum are managed by the same law firm.

The 50% (450,000) is just a recommendation for the Government from an Economic committee:

http://www.budget.gc.ca/aceg-ccce/home-accueil-en.html
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/immigration-system-increase-mccallum-1.3812749

I personally think it's a pretty stupid recommendation. The more immigrants we bring in, the lower the median salary will be. 300k / year is a good enough quota.

Employers always want to pay the least salaries to workers, and new immigrants usually accept a pay cut to get the first jobs in Canada.

true that, however immigration is a very long term solution... they wont be thinking 4-5 years down the line ... they will be thinking 20-30 years down the line (atleast they should be lol )

 

[vensak]

true that, however immigration is a very long term solution... they wont be thinking 4-5 years down the line ... they will be thinking 20-30 years down the line (atleast they should be lol )

That is if you look on it as something where you want to keep most of the people that have immigrated. If you however already plan, that 50% of those who will come without much ties in first 5 years will leave, than it is about something different

 

[thestunner316]

That is if you look on it as something where you want to keep most of the people that have immigrated. If you however already plan, that 50% of those who will come without much ties in first 5 years will leave, than it is about something different

well if 50% are leaving, there is something wrong with the program or the country

 

[vensak]

well if 50% are leaving, there is something wrong with the program or the country

If the original intention behind is to keep most of the immigrants in then yes, there is something wrong in the setup. However if the original intention actually counts with such leaving % as a way to cash in ones savings and taxes payment without being obliged to deliver much, then there is nothing wrong with the system itself.