My response was to you and not to OP.
My response to OP is in the above posts for your leisure reading.
#521 , #526 , and #525 which are self explanatory, with sources and links.
The long paragraphs are I am quoting, are the Constitution of Canada, and it's the law of the land. And I am not selectively quoting you. Your first statement made a blanket claim. Not you can argue to eternity, it won't change that your statement was wrong.
Also, as a person who is on a TRV in Canada, can work in any part of Canada, including QC. However, if the PR application is pending, to which an applicant applied as a FSW, then he has to have an intention to settle in Canada, other than QC.
"75. (1) For the purposes of subsection 12(2) of the Act, the federal skilled worker class is hereby prescribed as a class of persons who are skilled workers and who may become permanent residents on the basis of their ability to become economically established in Canada and who intend to reside in a province other than the Province of Quebec."
Further, the courts have held, "[t]he assessment of intention, since it is a highly subjective notion, may take into account all indicia, including past conduct, present circumstances, and future plans, as best as can be ascertained from the available evidence and context." Since OP has stated that his intention to move to QC is to take a temp job.
What you call a smart advice, is devoid of the what law states. Also in current times when getting a job is difficult, asking some to just forgo an opportunity, when the law states that it can be done, doesn't seem to be that smart.
As long as the OP can provide his intention to reside in Canada, other than QC, there is no issue. And there are many federal court cases that have laid the law and the threshold of evidence required.
Law is not about assumptions, should you, could you. It's about definitive answers.
I have also posted a case from the federal law, which details the law and how intention is looked into, as interpreted by the court, not assumptions.
If you would only read.
As always, this is a public forum. Everyone is free to give their opinion, whether it be devoid of what the law states. It is for the OP to do what is best for his application or seek independent legal advise.
Legal falcon chapter 1 rule 1 states that write 300 words with full confusion so hardly people can argue and fact remain vague. If you go to any professional lawyer or consultants, they will tell the same thing which I told. If you were not intended to live in Quebec dont go there, at least the decision is made on your file and your receive your mobility rights.
And law that you stated above it clearly states the word subjective notion and OP has intention to move for a temp job. When someone move and application is under process, that is called making profile complicated with own bare hands. Again, It is not about "can you move?" YES. Should you move? NO
Again, We all are entitled to have an opinion, I have mine and most of the immigration lawyer will say the same