Krish,
I think it was not required to informed about pregnancy to VO at that time.
As per rule when there is a change in a family history it is compulsory to inform this change to VO but it was a proposed change... anyway but it will not affect yr case but i hope you will get good response on 2.2.12.
All the best..
HONEYJACK
I think it was not required to informed about pregnancy to VO at that time.
As per rule when there is a change in a family history it is compulsory to inform this change to VO but it was a proposed change... anyway but it will not affect yr case but i hope you will get good response on 2.2.12.
All the best..
HONEYJACK