Also, here https://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/threads/when-an-agent-says-eligibility-met-does-it-mean-passed-or-recommended-passed.608530/So, recommended pass is worse than "met"? Then how about "review required"?
so people even say this:
It goes through 3 steps.
1. Assistant. R10 is ok
2. Analyst. Met.
3. Officer. Recommended passed.
Therefore, met is not the same as recommended passed.
Hm....
Also found this: https://www.canadavisa.com/canada-immigration-discussion-board/threads/eligibility-met-applicants-join-here.614873/
Eligibility MET: Sydney uses this term when an agent/analyst does the eligibility review.
Eligibility RECOMMENDED PASS: Ottawa uses the term when an analyst/agent does the eligibility review.
Last edited: