+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
loncan said:
I'm delighted to report a positive interview experience. :)

The officer was helpful and good at taking away nerves, which made things quite straightforward.

I was given the same 2 weeks to medical, 2 months to finish kind of timeline as others have reported.

Congrats loncan :)

Now it's just formality for you I hope.
 
prince_of_darkness said:
Hi Guys,

I went for interview in London yesterday,
Start was ok, then the officer started asking me about my previous experience in a different category 2174 to be precise,

Then at the end he said he is not satisfied that I have performed all the duties listed and may have asked my organisation to type a letter like that.
To which I responded I did. He was satisfied that I have performed some of the duties though. Basically the whole interview was based on 2174.
he said the category in which u have applied that is 2174 " Im not satisfied that u have performed all of the duties and hence I am rejecting you but will review and let u know in 2-3 weeks".

I clarified to him, that I have applied in 2147 and thats my primary occupation and hence should be considered on that, to which he replied there must be some confusion. He didnt even ask me about 2147 for which I had applied.
Then he said, even though its 2147 based on the interview, i am rejecting you at the moment but will review and let u know in 2-3 weeks time.
before the start he had checked my education and made me sign the background deceleration.

He was adamant that he will reject me. Before the start he had asked me about all the work I had done in brief and was satisfied. and then he started drilling me on 2174.
An immigration officer accepting his fault that there is confusion and why should there be any confusion thats what I am thinking. I guess he never even had read my application properly.

Hope for the best,

That's ridiculous. Anyway, I am sure that you'll still get positive eligibility but with a delay. You have pointed out a mistake in his interview, and I am sure he will review his decision. Hang in there a little longer :)
 
prince_of_darkness said:
Hi Guys,

I went for interview in London yesterday,
Start was ok, then the officer started asking me about my previous experience in a different category 2174 to be precise,

Then at the end he said he is not satisfied that I have performed all the duties listed and may have asked my organisation to type a letter like that.
To which I responded I did. He was satisfied that I have performed some of the duties though. Basically the whole interview was based on 2174.
he said the category in which u have applied that is 2174 " Im not satisfied that u have performed all of the duties and hence I am rejecting you but will review and let u know in 2-3 weeks".

I clarified to him, that I have applied in 2147 and thats my primary occupation and hence should be considered on that, to which he replied there must be some confusion. He didnt even ask me about 2147 for which I had applied.
Then he said, even though its 2147 based on the interview, i am rejecting you at the moment but will review and let u know in 2-3 weeks time.
before the start he had checked my education and made me sign the background deceleration.

He was adamant that he will reject me. Before the start he had asked me about all the work I had done in brief and was satisfied. and then he started drilling me on 2174.
An immigration officer accepting his fault that there is confusion and why should there be any confusion thats what I am thinking. I guess he never even had read my application properly.

Hope for the best,

Sounds quite weird. IO doesn't know the proper NOC.

Hoping for the best for you prince_of_darkness
 
Extracted from OP-Manual!

12.3. Use of interviews
In most cases, officers should be able to determine membership in the class and whether the skilled worker can become economically established in Canada – either to approve or refuse an application – based on the information and documentation provided by the applicant. However, in some cases, an interview may be necessary in order to determine membership in the class and/or ability to economically establish.

In accordance with principles of procedural fairness, concerns that a visa officer may have regarding the accuracy or authenticity of information or documentation should be communicated to the applicant, whether these concerns are raised as the result of site visits, telephone checks, or through other means. Concerns can be communicated to the applicant in writing or at an interview.

Officers may choose to conduct interviews with applicants to:

  • ensure that information or documentation submitted as part of the application is truthful and complete;
  • detect and deter fraudulent information and documents;
  • clarify specific information or details; and
  • conduct quality control.

Note: In convoking an applicant for an interview, officers should provide appropriate context as to the reason for the interview so that the applicant is aware of the general purpose in advance of attending.

Offices other than the one responsible for application processing may be called upon to conduct interviews should the need arise. For example, applicants may be convoked for an interview at a non-processing office to accurately assess the applicant’s eligibility or admissibility, including the need to interview family members as part of the application process.

Note: Officers may not conduct interviews to assess an applicant’s language proficiency.

12.4. Detecting and deterring fraud
Interviews, site visits, and telephone checks have proven to be the most effective ways to detect and combat fraud. The information gained through interviews where fraud is detected will help officers to identify current trends and patterns, and refine their approach to fraud deterrence on an ongoing basis.

Visa offices will be expected to undertake both targeted and random verifications to detect and deter fraud. The volume and percentage of cases subject to verification should be high enough to act as a meaningful disincentive to those who would engage in fraudulent practices.

Pursuant to A40, material misrepresentation is grounds for inadmissibility in its own right with a prescribed two-year period of inadmissibility for those who are, directly or indirectly, involved in such fraudulent practices.

13. Procedure: Determining admissibility
Once the processing office has determined that an applicant is a member of the Federal Skilled Worker Class pursuant to R75, the principal applicant and their family members, whether accompanying or not, must complete medical examinations if required, and pass criminal and security checks.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Basically Background checks are over once Interview is cleared & eligibility is positive from the employer. I hope London Visa Office works as mentioned in the manual ::)
 
rawdah said:
Congrats loncan :)

Now it's just formality for you I hope.

Thanks!
@prince-of-darkness - so sorry to hear that, hope it is all fixed promptly for you.
 
I would have been satisfied if he would have drilled me in every job that I had done. but he laid emphasis on 2174. Though I had provided an experience letter for, but I had applied in 2147 which should have been the major point for my interview. Instead he was worried about 2174 and even said as per the major job category for wich u have aplied 2174 he started asking questions. he didnt even touch any other experience letter.

I clarified at the end that its 2147 and not 2174 and even pointed out the reference letter for which I had applied. But still he said I am rejecting at the moment based on the interview and will review and let u know the final outcome in 2-3 weeks. he did accept the fault.

Later on when i reached home, I checked my Application form and as stated I had applied as 2147 only .
Not much mistake from my side.


rawdah said:
Sounds quite weird. IO doesn't know the proper NOC.

Hoping for the best for you prince_of_darkness
 
prince_of_darkness said:
I would have been satisfied if he would have drilled me in every job that I had done. but he laid emphasis on 2174. Though I had provided an experience letter for, but I had applied in 2147 which should have been the major point for my interview. Instead he was worried about 2174 and even said as per the major job category for wich u have aplied 2174 he started asking questions. he didnt even touch any other experience letter.

I clarified at the end that its 2147 and not 2174 and even pointed out the reference letter for which I had applied. But still he said I am rejecting at the moment based on the interview and will review and let u know the final outcome in 2-3 weeks. he did accept the fault.

Later on when i reached home, I checked my Application form and as stated I had applied as 2147 only .
Not much mistake from my side.

Sad what ever happened.
Seems like he gets confused as u have submitted 2174 jd's from u r previous experience.

Positive thing is he said he will review again n let u know, hope u will sail through easily. To be on safe side alert your employer n reference, they may get some verification call.
All the best.
 
Contrats Cladioa and Loncon for your positive Interview.

Really sorry hear the experience for prince_of_darkness . Friend just immediately write a CSE. In the Subject Line "Urgent & Important -....."

Explain the confusion with officer, hope you will get possitive answer. Do not wait till you get the reply from LVO.

I wish all the applicatants should get possitive result. May god help all of us. Since its a Dream for future Generation and god should help us.
 
prince_of_darkness said:
I would have been satisfied if he would have drilled me in every job that I had done. but he laid emphasis on 2174. Though I had provided an experience letter for, but I had applied in 2147 which should have been the major point for my interview. Instead he was worried about 2174 and even said as per the major job category for wich u have aplied 2174 he started asking questions. he didnt even touch any other experience letter.

I clarified at the end that its 2147 and not 2174 and even pointed out the reference letter for which I had applied. But still he said I am rejecting at the moment based on the interview and will review and let u know the final outcome in 2-3 weeks. he did accept the fault.

Later on when i reached home, I checked my Application form and as stated I had applied as 2147 only .
Not much mistake from my side.

Confusion will be ended soon positively inshAllah.

All the best bro.
 
SA2263 said:
Yes.... mine were also received by Hussein

Hi SA2263,

my NOc is also 2263....

may I ask about your timeline after you submitted your bank draft and after LVO received your medical results....how long did you wait for the passport request? and to have it returned to you.....thanks
 
prince_of_darkness said:
I would have been satisfied if he would have drilled me in every job that I had done. but he laid emphasis on 2174. Though I had provided an experience letter for, but I had applied in 2147 which should have been the major point for my interview. Instead he was worried about 2174 and even said as per the major job category for wich u have aplied 2174 he started asking questions. he didnt even touch any other experience letter.

I clarified at the end that its 2147 and not 2174 and even pointed out the reference letter for which I had applied. But still he said I am rejecting at the moment based on the interview and will review and let u know the final outcome in 2-3 weeks. he did accept the fault.

Later on when i reached home, I checked my Application form and as stated I had applied as 2147 only .
Not much mistake from my side.
Don't worry buddy... god willing you will get through. Noticed from spreadsheet other 2 interviews(may be many more) today are 2174 , loncan and dash.30, most likely vo assumed u to be 2174, to begin with.Hope for for the best.
 
Congrats cog11 and loncan.
 
BTW, Congratulations to loncan, COG11 and others who passed interviews :)
 
Congrats cog11 and loncan.

Now so many interview holders awaiting Medical Request & RPRF from LVO !

LVO must speed up now !

When is Last interview among our colleagues, this month (registered forum member) ? Might after that interview, we see some progress !