Raindrop73 said:
Rupeshhari,cchabert
Thanks my friends. The problem for me is not the blue collar jobs itself but the system there in general. there is no shame in work. After graduating from my MSc here in the UK, and while awaiting the funding for my PhD project, I had to do a very hard work to support my family. I did it and I am ready to do it again if I have to.
I came up with this decision after doing a deep reserach. The research I made just confirmed what I was trying to forget. I was trying to forget the many PhD holders I met, in person, in Canada when I was studying there, who had to work as cab drivers or doing similar jobs. They were stuck in such jobs for many years regardless the hard efforts to work their ways up.
That was at the booming economy times, now I am sure the situation is worse. Time now, in my humble opinion, is no good for moving there with the raising unemployment rate
I will concentrate in my PhD here in the UK where talent is much appreciated.
Flori,
My friend.
(If you get "stuck" in a blue collar job that you don't like for the rest of your life, its because you are letting it happen.)
I do NOT agree. How on earth could you come up with such conclusion. When many talented professionals moved there and been denied the opportunity to get the job they deserve and forced to work, for 12 hours a day, just to keep the food in the table, do you call this ' letting it happen !!
I call it ' locked out'.
(Canada IS NO HEAVEN people please understand that. But it does offer some advantages like a better health system,)
I totally agree with the first bit. Regarding the last sentence, I strongly recommend you to read the following link:
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080618/health_canadians_080618/20080618/?hub=Canada
All the best my friends.
I understand your point Raindrop, I really do, I know what it is to fight to get to some level in your life and how do you feel on not to want to go back. But believe me I and many of us know about real survival, about getting ahead on our lifes, on how to defeat adverse circunstances to advance. And I think the main obstacle to be sucessful its ourselves. I don't know your life, but let me tell you I've lived and see things you'd never imagine (or maybe you have seen them too). But remember most of us came from third world countries where from some ppl staying alive after highschool its a miracle (not that is my case). When you have to have two jobs and pay for you education, when you have nothing but less than $10 in your pocket and you still make it tru the month. When you make the minimum salary working 12 hrs a day (and no overtime) and still make to graduate from college somehow. And then you are telling me that one could have a Ph.D. already and that that person won't be able to make it tru. I believe then that its because you don't have what its necessary, if ppl with lesser advantage can pull it, why couldn't you. That's how I get to that conclusion.
Anyway, I'm not trying to change your mind, your reasons for moving (or in this case not moving) and my reasons are tottaly different, I don't know them and you don't know mine, so it would be stupid and arrogant of my part to try to change your mind. I really think you are right in taking the decision, and I totally understand ppl who wouldn't wanna move if their lifestyle doesn't make you take the risk IT'D BE STUPID TO MOVE TO A COUNTRY YOU DON'T KNOW, or that in your case, you know already.
And as for your link, I tought you were a phsysician. according to the note, you might re-consider, it looks like they are in real need of doctors. Also look at the comments, they are proposing to change to the US health care system (THEY GOT TO BE KIDDING ME).
There is one comment to pay attention to:
"
Go beyond the headline, people!
Does anybody read more than just the headline before posting a comment?
A few brief quotes: "four million Canadians are without a doctor, either because they have not found a family physician to take them on, or because they have not looked for one". Hmm....so I wonder how many people CANNOT find a doctor, versus how many DID NOT TRY to find a doctor?
Read on: "3.3 million individuals reported having somewhere to go when they fall ill" So, the headline could equally well have read "1 in 28 Canadians report not having anywhere to go when they fall ill". But that wouldn't have been nearly as attention-grabbing now, would it?
Read on: "most of them [men over age 12] admitted they have not looked for one". Hmmm. And "five per cent of seniors aged 65 or older reported not having a doctor. Only two per cent had not looked for one.". So, the headline could also have read "1 in 10 Canadians do not have a doctor because they haven't looked for one". That headline probably wouldn't have attracted 35 comments.....
You can lead people to information, but you can't make them read...."
The truth is ppl will always complaint no matter how good they have it, but have no worries, I'd look more into the subject as is my style.