sammystorm19
Champion Member
- Jan 20, 2012
- 47
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- KGN
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- 22-05-13
- Doc's Request.
- 23-09-14
- AOR Received.
- 12-06-13
- File Transfer...
- 27-06-13
- Med's Done....
- 18-01-13
- Passport Req..
- 09-10-14
- VISA ISSUED...
- 17-10-14
- LANDED..........
- 07-11-14
The sponsorship approval has nothing to do with you but with your boyfriend....and yes he can be declined if there was misrepresented....which a few of us have stated as he didn't claim you when he landed and you have now applied for family class under conjugal saying that you did live together....so unless this information that you said isn't true then don't worry about it and let them work on the file. There have been a few people on here that have waited long for SA...but again he can only be declined if he doesn't meet the requirments for SA or has misresprented himself.Roxie-B said:Good morning JamFam,
I hope the day is going well for each an everyone of you so far.
Well, I am on my 87 day of waiting to hear whether my Sponsor was approved. I have read in another forum of a similar case as my own an it was refused...I am aslo reading on cic tht I would have 30 day in which it appeal my case if it was refused. I jus cant figure what could they be processing so long. At this point, I honestly thing they are weighing whether or not I Misrepresented on my VISA application by putting single.
But in all honestly this case is very very technical ...but the wait is jus scaring me
I have a few questions for you guys,
1. If he has his own "family" household where he resided and I have my own, and he visited on a regular that could nt be seen as a common-law relationship could it?
2. a) If it can not be classified as a common-law relationship given it does not have all the characteristics to hold claim to it, would that then mean we where only dating?
b) And if so can they still argue Misrepresentation under tht clause?
3. Given that we were only dating and not common law nor conjugal would that mean I am or was at the time in fact single?
4. If all documents provided are dated in 2013 when the sponsor arrived in canada (ie bank account started 2013, life insurance 2013 western union 2013 everything dated after his arrived in canada) couldn't that mean the proof of conjugal relationship began in 2013 to present.
could you guys give me your honest review... I know even though we provide our evidence the review is subjective because no one is there speak on them an thus it can only be judge by what was provided so be subject let me know.
P.S. I know Im rambling but im honestly scared and lost right now.
Thank you guys
1) you have to live in the same household for more than 365 days to be common law....again conjugal doean't apply to you as you have been together and there are no reasons stopping you from being married IE - regilous reasons
2) Yes you are dating but you have stated in the past that you did live together so i am no confused.
3) If you are not common law then yes you are considered dating only and therefore you can't apply for your PR. You have to be in a common law relationship or married. You are not conjugal as I have stated before. There is nothing holding you guys apart except the fact the hs is in Canada and you are in JA. That is not an issue at all.
4) Read above
Roxie...I M sorry if I sound harsh but you have been asking the same questions over and over again and have been told by me and other very senior members on this forum the same thing. I am giving you my honest answer. You are better off cancelling your file, getting married and then applyng again. You will be declined for conjugal and you don't apply for common law - and if you did apply for common law you boyfriend misrepressented himself when he landed and he can have his PR taken away and he will have to leave Canada.