Well you are leaving at yourself at the VO's discretion. Get a processing officer who feels like being lenient and no problems, get a processing officer who goes by the strict 'letter of the law' and you get an immediate rejection.jassu2 said:well if the govt wants only mm/yyyy and not dd/mm/yyyy. its no fraud, my current job, i joined on 15th march.. i m gonna mention march as starting month, irrespctive how many days its calculated as.. offcourse they r gonna hav my other documents to chk this thru. so theres no fraud.. its the way CIC likes to calculate.. simple..
Under section A11.2, an officer may not issue a visa to an applicant who did not or does not meet the Express Entry minimum entry criteria (MEC) or did not or does not possess the qualifications for which they received their CRS score at the time when
the Invitation to Apply (ITA) was issued; or
the e-APR was received by CIC.
When reviewing an application, processing offices must determine if
the applicant possesses the qualifications that they declared in their e-APR, as corroborated by the applicant’s supporting documentation; and
when the applicant submits their e-APR, the information provided in their Express Entry profile has not materially changed to the degree that the applicant would not have been issued an ITA in that round of invitations.
Accordingly, officers should refuse an application under section A11.2 if it is determined that
at the time of the ITA or e-APR, the applicant did not or does not meet the MEC, which includes the requirements of the program to which they were invited to apply; or
the applicant’s recalculated CRS score has fallen below that of the lowest-ranked candidate invited to apply in that round of invitations.
http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/resources/tools/perm/express/refuse.asp