i think with only CEC draws the cutoffs will be down.CEC is way too hard for many simply because it requires work exp in NOC 0, A or B.
If someone can get into either CEC or that new program, which one would be better to go for?I don't think they would do CEC draws. Whatever they cover with new program that launches in Septrmber will probably be what they see as accommodating CEC candidates.
I don't think the new program will be quicker than the *Express* EntryIf someone can get into either CEC or that new program, which one would be better to go for?
If it is part of EE then IRCC has a pre-defined priority of which program you must apply when you are qualified in more than one programs. This is strictly defined in IRPA and reiterated in the Bill C-19 (with the term "program" replaced by "catagory" I believe). So as a candidate you don't get to choose which program you are gonna apply.If it is part of Express Entry, then you will automatically be considered, I assume. Or maybe you will need to have an expression of interest or something.
If not part of Express Entry, then you can apply at that one AND Express Entry at the same time. It will probably carry some costs (?) but I don't think you (any of us?) will have to choose.
Wait, is this how you go? You can't be both FSW and CEC, for example? Bummer.If it is part of EE then IRCC has a pre-defined priority of which program you must apply when you are qualified in more than one programs. This is strictly defined in IRPA and reiterated in the Bill C-19 (with the term "program" replaced by "catagory" I believe). So as a candidate you don't get to choose which program you are gonna apply.
If it is something else, then go for EE for sure cause at least it is quick.
Of course you can.. You can be qualified in all three programs (FSW/CEC/FST) at the same time..Wait, is this how you go? You can't be both FSW and CEC, for example? Bummer.
I do hope they will think of CEC people, because most 500+ candidates are not CEC, and if the new program only targets limited NOCs (some of which are similar to those that will probably be targeted by EE NOC draws), then CEC becomes a bit meaningless. And it means losing international students, many of which who picked Canada because of PGWP and an opportunity for PR. I think they know the importance of this (for the economy, in terms of keeping numbers of international students). But I could be wrong. It wouldn't be the first time.I don't think you need to have multiple profiles. When you submit your profile the system automatically determines which programs you are qualified. Currently there are only 3 so it is not very complicated. In the future with the new "TR2PR" (should it be part of EE), the new catagories, things will get complicated, but to you as a candidate nothing changes. You show yourself to IRCC, and they pick.
With the new system implemented I think CEC will still be on top of priority, since in that way IRCC can invite more "catagoried" ppl. That's exactly why they want the new system so badly in the first place.
Not only 500+, at this point it is tricky to know when it will go down to low 500s. I'm hoping 520s in the next 1-2 draws but I can't see it going to 500 quickly just looking at sheer numbersI do hope they will think of CEC people, because most 500+ candidates are not CEC, and if the new program only targets limited NOCs (some of which are similar to those that will probably be targeted by EE NOC draws), then CEC becomes a bit meaningless. And it means losing international students, many of which who picked Canada because of PGWP and an opportunity for PR. I think they know the importance of this (for the economy, in terms of keeping numbers of international students). But I could be wrong. It wouldn't be the first time.