Join List of Pakistani Residents After 1 April 2010 CHC London

[doct88]

Dear Khalid, in case if CHC London is sending originals then you will get a TCS, and the individual envelope named to you will be originated from Pakistan not London (Visatronix gets a bulk from London to Karachi and then sends Docs to individuals as per the address details made available by CHC London)
But if you get MR, and a letter requesting for PCC, RPRF, POF and updated forms BUT NO ORIGINALS, then you will get them through Royal Mail in a khaki color envelope (size is half of A4) and the Forms/letter will be single time folded. It will be have address of CHC London given on that. it will be via ordinary mail NO Registered Mail (meaning by no receipt of delivery) all on the mercy of Post Man.

This is not always the case, because i got all my original docs and medical request via ordinary mail and not through TCS.......

 

[salmanahm]

Dear Ali

I will be getting married this week inshallah and want to add my wife to the existing application. Just one quick question. I have to send all the document of my spouse to CHC before May. Now the problem is that her Passport and National Identity card are bearing Father's Name. If I apply for a change now then it will take probably a month to update both of these. Is it mandatory for the wife to have the husband's name on the passport and CNIC.

 

[canada1234]

Dear Ali

I will be getting married this week inshallah and want to add my wife to the existing application. Just one quick question. I have to send all the document of my spouse to CHC before May. Now the problem is that her Passport and National Identity card are bearing Father's Name. If I apply for a change now then it will take probably a month to update both of these. Is it mandatory for the wife to have the husband's name on the passport and CNIC.

It is mandatory of husband's name on CNIC & passport. Go for urgent CNIC and passport it would take 14 days for both.

 

[out of the blue]

This is my first time to join the forum but i do follow the thread religiously as it somehow lessened my worries. My application was received by Nova Scotia last March 2010 and was transfered to Buffalo office on May 2010. It was transfered again to Los Angeles last De, 1, 2011. Just recently when i look for my E-Cas its noted that my application had been reviewed and processing begun effective feb 15, 2012. and yet up to this date i havent received any further instructions from the VO. I have send them a case specific inquiry by email and hope positive thing will happen. i apply under FWS under arranged employment. Im jut worried though because ive read from the recent cic news that those applications made after february 20008 and who havent received any decisions yet as of march 29, 2012 maybe send back to applicant and refund to be made. Since my application status is already in process will it be safe to assume that mine is safe? And that i just need to wait patiently and pray harder? Hope you guys can give me moral support and advise! thanks .

 

[samsung94]

Yes all belong to 0213 NOC and one more important fact is those who received acceptance/ waiting letter their full documents reached after June-2010.

May be that could be the reason of that kind of letter. Senior please advise.

you may b right.....as my noc is also 0213... but my dtailed docs receiveing date is end of april 2010....
and re-processing date is enf of feb 2012 n received my med +pcc + updated docs + landing fee in 1st week of march 2012...but not proof of funds and no original docs received.

 

[Julieana]

All those who are thinking to appeal...be positive if you are on merit..

Go to http://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/en/ and search on Skilled Worker Job Duties.

 

[jnathan]

Julieana

I have gone thorough some verdicts and found that the success rate is no more than 40%
moreover, the court orders for the case to be reconsidered but it does not approve the case. it would be delicate to see what Immigration Officers did after cases like these referred to them for reconsideration. I dont believe they approve them all.

have a look
==============

THIS COURT’S JUDGMENT is that

1. The application for judicial review is allowed;

2. The matter is remitted for reconsideration by another Visa Officer;

3. No costs awarded;

4. No question of general importance is certified.




the matter is referred to a different visa officer for reconsideration.

the matter be remitted for redetermination by a different Immigration Officer.

THIS COURT’S JUDGMENT is that this application for judicial review is allowed.

THIS COURT’S JUDGMENT is that the application is granted and the matter is remitted for consideration by a different decision maker in accordance with these reasons.

IT IS ORDERED that the application for judicial review is dismissed.

THIS COURT’S JUDGMENT is that the application for judicial review is dismissed.

THIS COURT’S JUDGMENT is that



1. The application is dismissed.

THIS COURT’S JUDGMENT is that the application for judicial review is dismissed.


IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The application for judicial review is allowed, the decision of the officer is set aside and the matter is referred to a different officer for redetermination.


THIS COURT ORDERS AND ADJUDGES that the application is dismissed.

 

[cheeta37]

Julieana

I have gone thorough some verdicts and found that the success rate is no more than 40%
moreover, the court orders for the case to be reconsidered but it does not approve the case. it would be delicate to see what Immigration Officers did after cases like these referred to them for reconsideration. I dont believe they approve them all.

have a look
==============

THIS COURT'S JUDGMENT is that

1. The application for judicial review is allowed;

2. The matter is remitted for reconsideration by another Visa Officer;

3. No costs awarded;

4. No question of general importance is certified.




the matter is referred to a different visa officer for reconsideration.

the matter be remitted for redetermination by a different Immigration Officer.

THIS COURT'S JUDGMENT is that this application for judicial review is allowed.

THIS COURT'S JUDGMENT is that the application is granted and the matter is remitted for consideration by a different decision maker in accordance with these reasons.

IT IS ORDERED that the application for judicial review is dismissed.

THIS COURT'S JUDGMENT is that the application for judicial review is dismissed.

THIS COURT'S JUDGMENT is that



1. The application is dismissed.

THIS COURT'S JUDGMENT is that the application for judicial review is dismissed.


IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The application for judicial review is allowed, the decision of the officer is set aside and the matter is referred to a different officer for redetermination.


THIS COURT ORDERS AND ADJUDGES that the application is dismissed.

read cases regarding refusals of cases regarding job duties mismatch on following link


http://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fc-eliisa/search?language=EN&courtScope=fc&all=Job+duties&title=&citation=

 

[Arsh Ali]

This is my first time to join the forum but i do follow the thread religiously as it somehow lessened my worries. My application was received by Nova Scotia last March 2010 and was transfered to Buffalo office on May 2010. It was transfered again to Los Angeles last De, 1, 2011. Just recently when i look for my E-Cas its noted that my application had been reviewed and processing begun effective feb 15, 2012. and yet up to this date i havent received any further instructions from the VO. I have send them a case specific inquiry by email and hope positive thing will happen. i apply under FWS under arranged employment. Im jut worried though because ive read from the recent cic news that those applications made after february 20008 and who havent received any decisions yet as of march 29, 2012 maybe send back to applicant and refund to be made. Since my application status is already in process will it be safe to assume that mine is safe? And that i just need to wait patiently and pray harder? Hope you guys can give me moral support and advise! thanks .

Thats before dear not after, so dont worry, inshallah everything will go fine...

 

[aarfie]

Yes dear
Arsh is right.
its not after.
its before.

keep praying.
aarfie.

Thats before dear not after, so dont worry, inshallah everything will go fine...

 

[aarfie]

Yes Juleana,
I also agree with this quote. ;D
aarfie..

I do believe in Allah, whatever is best for us He will put that in front..
Well said Julieana

 

[aarfie]

Welcome dear newbie.
Just keep praying and keep reading this forum.
here ppl are helping everyone.
so here is no fear man.
just keep praying for urself and others.
aarfie...

This is my first time to join the forum but i do follow the thread religiously as it somehow lessened my worries. My application was received by Nova Scotia last March 2010 and was transfered to Buffalo office on May 2010. It was transfered again to Los Angeles last De, 1, 2011. Just recently when i look for my E-Cas its noted that my application had been reviewed and processing begun effective feb 15, 2012. and yet up to this date i havent received any further instructions from the VO. I have send them a case specific inquiry by email and hope positive thing will happen. i apply under FWS under arranged employment. Im jut worried though because ive read from the recent cic news that those applications made after february 20008 and who havent received any decisions yet as of march 29, 2012 maybe send back to applicant and refund to be made. Since my application status is already in process will it be safe to assume that mine is safe? And that i just need to wait patiently and pray harder? Hope you guys can give me moral support and advise! thanks .

 

[Arsh Ali]

HinnaJamal is the applicant whose NOC is not 0213 and will pick his letter today from TCS. Let us see what does he get?

Starali any update on this, what he/she got?????

 

[Arsh Ali]

Yes all belong to 0213 NOC and one more important fact is those who received acceptance/ waiting letter their full documents reached after June-2010.

May be that could be the reason of that kind of letter. Senior please advise.

I guess its more about NOCs or their objective of getting things done by June 2012... as I see very few people whot got medicals etc in April. Please comment seniors

 

[Julieana]

Yes Juleana,
I also agree with this quote. ;D
aarfie..