Inland Spouse Sponsorship Under Policy

[Earth2Mars]

This is parts taken from The Public Policy of IRCC.

I dont understand if removal order is allowed in the public policy.

Lack of status​

For the purposes of the current public policy only, persons with a “lack of status” refers to those in the following situations:

• persons who have overstayed a visa, visitor record, work permit or student permit;

“Lack of status” does not refer to any other inadmissibilities including:

• persons under removal orders or facing enforcement proceedings for reasons other than the above-noted lack of status reasons.

Note: Most persons who are under a removal order or facing enforcement proceedings are eligible for initial consideration under the public policy as they meet the criteria in R124. However, they cannot however receive a positive final decision or acceptance of their case (i.e., grant of permanent residence) as they will be found inadmissible in the step two examination of their case.

 

[YVR123]

This is parts taken from The Public Policy of IRCC.

I dont understand if removal order is allowed in the public policy.

I don't fully understand your question. Unless you have gotten married and have the marriage certificate in hand. And submitted a complete inland sponsorship application with AOR, this public policy doesn't apply to you.

The wording that ask someone to leave because an extension is refused is NOT a removal order.