Between people who reject ITAs and those who are rejected by CIC, I bet they will get about 500 PRs out of 1500 ITAs.tm1986 said:they invited 1500 odd people to apply. Wow. I hope this means they will make quick decisions on existing applications in the system. Unless existing applications move fast i don't see how this will not snowball into a very big backlog.
I agreedobes said:Between people who reject ITAs and those who are rejected by CIC, I bet they will get about 500 PRs out of 1500 ITAs.
The percentage is definitely more than that, based on passing rate from history figures..dobes said:Between people who reject ITAs and those who are rejected by CIC, I bet they will get about 500 PRs out of 1500 ITAs.
You mean from CIC's midyear report showing that 1) there were 12,928 ITAs issued in the first half of the year, 2) that of those nearly 13,000 ITAs, only 7,528 actually submitted applications, and 3) that of that number, 5835 were still in process and 655 had been approved, meaning that 4) 1,038 had already been rejected by CIC? And meaning further that of the 1693 that had been processed completely, only 655 had been issued PR?lovelydream said:The percentage is definitely more than that, based on passing rate from history figures..
Seen for many ppl in forum who received AORs after us in June, July have their BG check "in progress".Anya654 said:Yes this is common with FSW outlanders. Mine too is still not started.
interesting, I didn't realize only about 55% percent submit their applications after they got an ITA.. that makes sense then..dobes said:You mean from CIC's midyear report showing that 1) there were 12,928 ITAs issued in the first half of the year, 2) that of those nearly 13,000 ITAs, only 7,528 actually submitted applications, and 3) that of that number, 5835 were still in process and 655 had been approved, meaning that 4) 1,038 had already been rejected by CIC? And meaning further that of the 1693 that had been processed completely, only 655 had been issued PR?
Of that 6490 that had either been issued PR or were still in process, I don't think it's so unrealistic to project that about 4500, or a little more than 1/3 of the people issued ITAs, would eventually get PR.
Or are you talking about different historical figures?
Right. Isn't it shocking how many people reject their ITAs? If people who weren't going to accept them got out of the pool, would the required CRS score be lower? I wonder if they are jeopardizing other people's chances at PR.lovelydream said:interesting, I didn't realize only about 55% percent submit their applications after they got an ITA.. that makes sense then..
I was simply talking about the passing rate from past years figures
PedDoc said:Got an email that profile is updated but no visible changes at all.... must be the "ghost" email some persons talk about ..
Ita March 20
aor may 15
In process aug 5th
Rprf aug 27
GHOST EMAIL August 28 and September 10