Re: Imigrating to Canada as same *censored word* spouse with HIV
It is generally CIC’s policy that persons with HIV/AIDS do not represent a danger to public health. Therefore, a foreign national with HIV/AIDS seeking entry into Canada would not, in the absence of contrary evidence, be inadmissible pursuant to A38(1). However, persons living with HIV/AIDS may be medically inadmissible if they have an associated medical condition that is considered a public health risk such as active tuberculosis.
Spouses, common law and conjugal partners as well as dependent children are also exempt from the excessive demand clause so this will not bar acceptance to Canada.
Also:
Family Class Applicants.
Canadian citizens or permanent residents of Canada may sponsor their:
1. Spouse (including same-sex spouses if legally married in one of the Canadian jurisdictions that recognizes same-sex marriage)
2. Common-law partner (a same-sex or opposite-sex partner they have lived with for at least one continuous year in a conjugal relationship)
3. Conjugal partner (a same-sex or opposite-sex partner they have been unable to live with for one continuous year in a conjugal relationship but have been in a conjugal relationship with for at least one year)
4. Dependent child
5. Mother or father
6. Grandparents
Certain Family Class members are exempt from medical inadmissibility due to
excessive demand. These are:
i. spouse
ii. common-law partner
iii. conjugal partner
iv. child
But not a father or mother or grandfather or grandmother.
An HIV positive Family Class member who is not exempt still has some options. These include:
a. The Canadian sponsor can appeal the refusal to the Immigration Appeal
Division (IAD) of the Immigration & Refugee Board
b. The applicant can apply to Citizenship & Immigration Canada for a Temporary Resident Permit (TRP)
c. The applicant can apply to Federal Court for leave for judicial review of the medical inadmissibility decision. Filing an appeal with the IAD is probably the best of the options.
The grounds for an appeal to the IAD could be:
1. Mistake of fact or law
2. Humanitarian and compassionate considerations that warrant the granting of special relief. This is significant because it gives a broader authority for decisionmaking to the IAD than either the visa officer initially assessing the application or a Federal Court judge on a judicial review application would have.