I was just wondering , how CIC tracks , when one exit the Canada ... One can fill any thing on Declaration card as they do not have any data to verify that (except stamps from other countries but now a day many countries use E-Gate cards or biometric data on entering rather than passport stamps). Secondly, info provided on Declaration cards are not updated on CIC system as there is no passport no. or PR card no. info.
Though, Gov't of Canada collects the airline records for each passenger but upto my info that is a classified and personal information and Neither CIC nor CBSA has an access to that ... That info is only used in case of terrorism or criminal or national security issues.
When one fills dates of physical residency in citizen or PR Card renewal forms, he can throw whatever dates he likes as far as his passport stamps do not contradict that. Maximum, CIC can ask the proof of those dates in form of employment records, health records, lease, schooling etc. And in absence of proof, they can maximum claim that physical presence is not substantiated by evidence. but they can not claim that the info provided on citizenship forms was a lie ..... means, for them to prove that it was a misrepresentation, is almost impossible ...
Is this correct ?
Regards
Though, Gov't of Canada collects the airline records for each passenger but upto my info that is a classified and personal information and Neither CIC nor CBSA has an access to that ... That info is only used in case of terrorism or criminal or national security issues.
When one fills dates of physical residency in citizen or PR Card renewal forms, he can throw whatever dates he likes as far as his passport stamps do not contradict that. Maximum, CIC can ask the proof of those dates in form of employment records, health records, lease, schooling etc. And in absence of proof, they can maximum claim that physical presence is not substantiated by evidence. but they can not claim that the info provided on citizenship forms was a lie ..... means, for them to prove that it was a misrepresentation, is almost impossible ...
Is this correct ?
Regards