With no offense to Cansun, he applied under the old rules. Under the old rules there were no ministerial list, and nearly all jobs were represented in the NOC matrix so one should try to fit the title perhaps. His lack of experience with the new rules is glaring.
It has been stated by many in this forum (not just Rupes) that actual duties is what matters. I have seen examples of people where titles didn't match to the ministerial list but their duties did and they got through the Sydney round. I have also seen examples of people in this forum where titles did match but their duties didn't and get rejected at the Sydney stage. This implies that duties are more important than title.
Obviously, you don't know what you are speaking about not only when it comes to Sydney (due to your lack of experience) but also because you don't seem to know anything about NOC codes. Please read OP6, page 16 and 17
The applicant must have:
• performed the actions described in the lead statement for the occupation (or occupations) as
set out in the occupational description of the NOC (R75(2)(b));
performed substantial number of the main duties, including all of the essential duties, of the
occupation as set out in the occupational description of the NOC (R75(2)(c)).
Also read the refusal letter on page page 40. It says people will be rejected on main duties. It mentions NOTHING about title.
You have indicated that you have work experience in (an) occupation(s) with the following NOC
(National Occupational Classification) code(s): LIST NOC CODES AND OCCUPATION TITLES.
Although the NOC code(s) correspond(s) to the occupations specified in the Instructions, the main
duties that you listed do not indicate EITHER that you performed the actions described in the lead
statement for the occupation, as set out in the occupational descriptions of the NOC OR that you
performed all of the essential duties and a substantial number of the main duties, as set out in the
occupational descriptions of the NOC. As such, I am not satisfied that you are a OCCUPATION
TITLE and NOC CODE.
If you want to argue with anyone, then argue with CIC and what they wrote in OP6. You have experience in the visa office stage, but have absolutely no experience in the Sydney stage, so stop misleading us.
It could be that if your job title doesn't match, you would be asked for an interview so they can make sure you are not being untruthful in your application. But for those people whose duties don't match but titles do, you probably won't even get through the Sydney stage to find out about the interview. For those people whose duties match but titles don't, at least you will get through the Sydney stage and get grilled at an interview and have a chance of going to Canada. If both your titles and duties match, then there is no argument here.
Cansun - no one has any problem with you sharing your experience or disagreeing with anyone. But starting a whole topic to slant someone is what we have a problem with. It shows a hidden agenda. The fact that you created a new profile just to slant Rupes means that you have a dislike for him and wanted to put him down. This is mean and counterproductive. I am sure Rupees will agree that you should share your experience and we all do. Just do it in a respectful manner.
I have just shown using OP6 that what you say contradicts CIC and OP6. What Rupes says is in line with OP6. So who should we believe? This is a rhetorical question. you are the weakest link.
