screech339
VIP Member
- Apr 2, 2013
- 552
- Category........
- Visa Office......
- Vegreville
- Job Offer........
- Pre-Assessed..
- App. Filed.......
- 14-08-2012
- AOR Received.
- 20-11-2012
- Med's Done....
- 18-07-2012
- Interview........
- 17-06-2013
- LANDED..........
- 17-06-2013
While I would wholly support anyone that anyone can work beyond PGWP expiry date so long as CIC can actually get this in writing. Where is this "that PGWP is "sort of like an OWP". I want definitve proof of writing/regulation that say otherwise. I won't not take an agent's word over a written policy on "implied status" for PGWP. If someone can provide this link and supportive document, please provide it here.
I don't mean any disrespect to anyone, I don't trust CiC agent caller's word when one can get 3 different agents with 3 different answers. If they can't be consistent in each and every time then I can't take their word at face value until they provide documentation that specifically say that those on PGWP can work past the expiry date under "implied status". It doesn't affect me at all but would hate to see someone get in a world of trouble when they get caught working past their PGWP over the word on an agent caller.
Screech339
I don't mean any disrespect to anyone, I don't trust CiC agent caller's word when one can get 3 different agents with 3 different answers. If they can't be consistent in each and every time then I can't take their word at face value until they provide documentation that specifically say that those on PGWP can work past the expiry date under "implied status". It doesn't affect me at all but would hate to see someone get in a world of trouble when they get caught working past their PGWP over the word on an agent caller.
Screech339