+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
Client Portal

Got Procedural Fairness Letter! HELP PLEASE!!

next444 said:
Will do! Hope this thread would help folks are in the similar situation.

How is yours? Any PPR yet?
Click to expand...

No dear not yet.

Although some movement so my wifes remedical is passed yesterday plus they acknowledged of receiving RPRF for both.

So technically speaking everything is passed just waiting for the final officer to go through it once and PPR.

Not sure how much time more though.

AOR : 1st February, 2019!

Hope its within 2 weeks, lets see.

I will keep you posted.

@scylla - Any idea how much more time after passing all the assessments including remedical.

I will appreciate your reply.

Thanks!
 
Hello everyone and the folks who applied with inland non-accompanying spouse:

Huge day for us. As you all know that I got PFL questioned about why have spouse non-accompanying while living together. I replied with the real reason: NOT ENOUGH POINTS. Eligibility went from Recommend Pass to Review Required.

After status changed from “we’re reviewing the documents you provided” to “not applicable”.
I called IRCC today and was told everything PASSED! Eligibility and security passed the yesterday when the status changed!

I really hope this thread help those are in the same boat as I know how confusing and anxious it would be for you guys. But once again it’s been proved that being honest with IRCC is totally the right thing to do than lying!

To sum up: NOT ENOUGH POINTS is a valid reason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sponsort, Holyange, Fantastica and 5 others
Congratulations!
I think every reason is valid and acceptable as long as it is honest and no lies.
I also got a great news today after I received PFL questioned about my working period. My eligibility has been finally approved after I submitted an explanation letter 3 weeks ago and after waiting for more than 9 months.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fantastica and nns14
next444 said:
Hello everyone and the folks who applied with inland non-accompanying spouse:

Huge day for us. As you all know that I got PFL questioned about why have spouse non-accompanying while living together. I replied with the real reason: NOT ENOUGH POINTS. Eligibility went from Recommend Pass to Review Required.

After status changed from “we’re reviewing the documents you provided” to “not applicable”.
I called IRCC today and was told everything PASSED! Eligibility and security passed the yesterday when the status changed!

I really hope this thread help those are in the same boat as I know how confusing and anxious it would be for you guys. But once again it’s been proved that being honest with IRCC is totally the right thing to do than lying!

To sum up: NOT ENOUGH POINTS is a valid reason.
Click to expand...


Wowwwwwwwwwwww dearrrrrr!

Congratulations!

Happy for you!

But I have a news to share too.

PPR email is HEREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
 
  • Like
Reactions: PrasadK, Fantastica, nns14 and 1 other person
next444 said:
Hello everyone and the folks who applied with inland non-accompanying spouse:

Huge day for us. As you all know that I got PFL questioned about why have spouse non-accompanying while living together. I replied with the real reason: NOT ENOUGH POINTS. Eligibility went from Recommend Pass to Review Required.

After status changed from “we’re reviewing the documents you provided” to “not applicable”.
I called IRCC today and was told everything PASSED! Eligibility and security passed the yesterday when the status changed!

I really hope this thread help those are in the same boat as I know how confusing and anxious it would be for you guys. But once again it’s been proved that being honest with IRCC is totally the right thing to do than lying!

To sum up: NOT ENOUGH POINTS is a valid reason.
Click to expand...
Bunny Thapar said:
Wowwwwwwwwwwww dearrrrrr!

Congratulations!

Happy for you!

But I have a news to share too.

PPR email is HEREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
Click to expand...

Congratulations!!!
 
next444 said:
Hello everyone and the folks who applied with inland non-accompanying spouse:

Huge day for us. As you all know that I got PFL questioned about why have spouse non-accompanying while living together. I replied with the real reason: NOT ENOUGH POINTS. Eligibility went from Recommend Pass to Review Required.

After status changed from “we’re reviewing the documents you provided” to “not applicable”.
I called IRCC today and was told everything PASSED! Eligibility and security passed the yesterday when the status changed!

I really hope this thread help those are in the same boat as I know how confusing and anxious it would be for you guys. But once again it’s been proved that being honest with IRCC is totally the right thing to do than lying!

To sum up: NOT ENOUGH POINTS is a valid reason.
Click to expand...

nice one...I got my PPR today !
 
  • Like
Reactions: next444 and Fantastica
next444 said:
Hello everyone and the folks who applied with inland non-accompanying spouse:

Huge day for us. As you all know that I got PFL questioned about why have spouse non-accompanying while living together. I replied with the real reason: NOT ENOUGH POINTS. Eligibility went from Recommend Pass to Review Required.

After status changed from “we’re reviewing the documents you provided” to “not applicable”.
I called IRCC today and was told everything PASSED! Eligibility and security passed the yesterday when the status changed!

I really hope this thread help those are in the same boat as I know how confusing and anxious it would be for you guys. But once again it’s been proved that being honest with IRCC is totally the right thing to do than lying!

To sum up: NOT ENOUGH POINTS is a valid reason.
Click to expand...
Congratulations!
 
  • Like
Reactions: next444
  • Like
Reactions: next444 and Fantastica
Got some updates on my friend's case here:

If you had read the earlier posts you'd know my friend in the same situation got refused because her non-accompanying inland, she filed a judicial review against the decision. Today she heard back from her lawyer a settlement was offered-- that IRCC is going to re-open her case and has referred her case back to a different VO for re-determination without costs bias.

Hopefully this helps with all the folks in the same boat. And I personally have finished my inland landing last week.

Best wishes to everyone!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fantastica and nns14
next444 said:
Got some updates on my friend's case here:

If you had read the earlier posts you'd know my friend in the same situation got refused because her non-accompanying inland, she filed a judicial review against the decision. Today she heard back from her lawyer a settlement was offered-- that IRCC is going to re-open her case and has referred her case back to a different VO for re-determination without costs bias.

Hopefully this helps with all the folks in the same boat. And I personally have finished my inland landing last week.

Best wishes to everyone!
Click to expand...
That's fantastic news. Forgive me as I have little to no knowledge in legal world, what does "without costs bias" mean?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
Procedural Fairness Letter
Replies
5
Views
1K
Express Entry / Expression of Interest
dotslash227
D
Z
Procedural Fairness
Replies
9
Views
3K
Express Entry / Expression of Interest
zshavit
Z
X
Procedural Fairness Letter
Replies
124
Views
40K
Express Entry / Expression of Interest
ankurtpatels
A
K
Procedural fairness letter from IRCC
Replies
16
Views
3K
Canadian Experience Class
ahsijaj
A
C
*Urgent* Procedural Fairness letter
Replies
1
Views
2K
Express Entry / Expression of Interest
21Goose
21Goose