Got Procedural Fairness Letter! HELP PLEASE!!

[Bunny Thapar]

Will do! Hope this thread would help folks are in the similar situation.

How is yours? Any PPR yet?

No dear not yet.

Although some movement so my wifes remedical is passed yesterday plus they acknowledged of receiving RPRF for both.

So technically speaking everything is passed just waiting for the final officer to go through it once and PPR.

Not sure how much time more though.

AOR : 1st February, 2019!

Hope its within 2 weeks, lets see.

I will keep you posted.

@scylla - Any idea how much more time after passing all the assessments including remedical.

I will appreciate your reply.

Thanks!

 

[next444]

Hello everyone and the folks who applied with inland non-accompanying spouse:

Huge day for us. As you all know that I got PFL questioned about why have spouse non-accompanying while living together. I replied with the real reason: NOT ENOUGH POINTS. Eligibility went from Recommend Pass to Review Required.

After status changed from “we’re reviewing the documents you provided” to “not applicable”.
I called IRCC today and was told everything PASSED! Eligibility and security passed the yesterday when the status changed!

I really hope this thread help those are in the same boat as I know how confusing and anxious it would be for you guys. But once again it’s been proved that being honest with IRCC is totally the right thing to do than lying!

To sum up: NOT ENOUGH POINTS is a valid reason.

 

[sethtammy]

Congratulations!
I think every reason is valid and acceptable as long as it is honest and no lies.
I also got a great news today after I received PFL questioned about my working period. My eligibility has been finally approved after I submitted an explanation letter 3 weeks ago and after waiting for more than 9 months.

 

[Bunny Thapar]

Hello everyone and the folks who applied with inland non-accompanying spouse:

Huge day for us. As you all know that I got PFL questioned about why have spouse non-accompanying while living together. I replied with the real reason: NOT ENOUGH POINTS. Eligibility went from Recommend Pass to Review Required.

After status changed from “we’re reviewing the documents you provided” to “not applicable”.
I called IRCC today and was told everything PASSED! Eligibility and security passed the yesterday when the status changed!

I really hope this thread help those are in the same boat as I know how confusing and anxious it would be for you guys. But once again it’s been proved that being honest with IRCC is totally the right thing to do than lying!

To sum up: NOT ENOUGH POINTS is a valid reason.

Wowwwwwwwwwwww dearrrrrr!

Congratulations!

Happy for you!

But I have a news to share too.

PPR email is HEREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

 

[next444]

Wowwwwwwwwwwww dearrrrrr!

Congratulations!

Happy for you!

But I have a news to share too.

PPR email is HEREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

I’m so happy for both of us!!!!! Feel like we went through this together. Thank god!

 

[nns14]

Hello everyone and the folks who applied with inland non-accompanying spouse:

Huge day for us. As you all know that I got PFL questioned about why have spouse non-accompanying while living together. I replied with the real reason: NOT ENOUGH POINTS. Eligibility went from Recommend Pass to Review Required.

After status changed from “we’re reviewing the documents you provided” to “not applicable”.
I called IRCC today and was told everything PASSED! Eligibility and security passed the yesterday when the status changed!

I really hope this thread help those are in the same boat as I know how confusing and anxious it would be for you guys. But once again it’s been proved that being honest with IRCC is totally the right thing to do than lying!

To sum up: NOT ENOUGH POINTS is a valid reason.

Wowwwwwwwwwwww dearrrrrr!

Congratulations!

Happy for you!

But I have a news to share too.

PPR email is HEREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

Congratulations!!!

 

[a16107]

Hello everyone and the folks who applied with inland non-accompanying spouse:

Huge day for us. As you all know that I got PFL questioned about why have spouse non-accompanying while living together. I replied with the real reason: NOT ENOUGH POINTS. Eligibility went from Recommend Pass to Review Required.

After status changed from “we’re reviewing the documents you provided” to “not applicable”.
I called IRCC today and was told everything PASSED! Eligibility and security passed the yesterday when the status changed!

I really hope this thread help those are in the same boat as I know how confusing and anxious it would be for you guys. But once again it’s been proved that being honest with IRCC is totally the right thing to do than lying!

To sum up: NOT ENOUGH POINTS is a valid reason.

nice one...I got my PPR today !

 

[hasithaviduranga]

Hello everyone and the folks who applied with inland non-accompanying spouse:

Huge day for us. As you all know that I got PFL questioned about why have spouse non-accompanying while living together. I replied with the real reason: NOT ENOUGH POINTS. Eligibility went from Recommend Pass to Review Required.

After status changed from “we’re reviewing the documents you provided” to “not applicable”.
I called IRCC today and was told everything PASSED! Eligibility and security passed the yesterday when the status changed!

I really hope this thread help those are in the same boat as I know how confusing and anxious it would be for you guys. But once again it’s been proved that being honest with IRCC is totally the right thing to do than lying!

To sum up: NOT ENOUGH POINTS is a valid reason.

Congratulations!

 

[Fantastica]

Congratulations @next444 @Bunny Thapar @a16107

I knew it would be unfair to refuse your application because you applied with spouse unaccompanying when you met the requirements. Congratulations!

 

[next444]

Hey guys,

Got landing interview today!!!!!!! Don't even have to send passport and go to border. I feel so lucky. Happy Lunar New Year everybody!!

Thank you @Fantastica @Bunny Thapar for everything in this thread. You have given me a lot of courage!

 

[Fantastica]

Hey guys,

Got landing interview today!!!!!!! Don't even have to send passport and go to border. I feel so lucky. Happy Lunar New Year everybody!!

Thank you @Fantastica @Bunny Thapar for everything in this thread. You have given me a lot of courage!

Big Congratulations! Wishing you the very best in Canada

 

[nns14]

Hey guys,

Got landing interview today!!!!!!! Don't even have to send passport and go to border. I feel so lucky. Happy Lunar New Year everybody!!

Congratulations!!!

Thank you @Fantastica @Bunny Thapar for everything in this thread. You have given me a lot of courage!

Hey! What about me??

 

[next444]

Congratulations!!!


Hey! What about me??

Dear @nns14,
Of course! Thank you for the support all the way along. I hope the best outcome for your application!

 

[next444]

Got some updates on my friend's case here:

If you had read the earlier posts you'd know my friend in the same situation got refused because her non-accompanying inland, she filed a judicial review against the decision. Today she heard back from her lawyer a settlement was offered-- that IRCC is going to re-open her case and has referred her case back to a different VO for re-determination without costs bias.

Hopefully this helps with all the folks in the same boat. And I personally have finished my inland landing last week.

Best wishes to everyone!

 

[nns14]

Got some updates on my friend's case here:

If you had read the earlier posts you'd know my friend in the same situation got refused because her non-accompanying inland, she filed a judicial review against the decision. Today she heard back from her lawyer a settlement was offered-- that IRCC is going to re-open her case and has referred her case back to a different VO for re-determination without costs bias.

Hopefully this helps with all the folks in the same boat. And I personally have finished my inland landing last week.

Best wishes to everyone!

That's fantastic news. Forgive me as I have little to no knowledge in legal world, what does "without costs bias" mean?