Dear Asivad Anac,Asivad Anac said:Fair points. Even though it explicitly states 'gifted', I suppose it can't hurt to reinforce that by saying these funds need not be repaid. The bit about Mr isn't a hard rule - could be cultural differences. Having a witness makes no difference but it can't hurt having that though it will be on a plain piece of paper and I'm not sure if bank officials anywhere in the World would casually initial such a document. Showing the value of funds in Canadian dollars or the equivalent action of showcasing official currency conversion rates (sell side for the bank) as on that date would be a welcome addition though not a mandatory inclusion.
As for CIC accepting this as POF, that is anyone's guess. Some officers have been convinced with lesser evidence, some have requested for even more and I know of at least 1 officer who doesn't like this workaround enough to send a refusal instead of requesting for more evidence. Like all workarounds, it won't work for everyone but it is the best OP can do.
About the skilled income bit, CIC isn't scrutinizing tax records of foreign applicants. Technically speaking, CIC should extend PPR to an EE applicant with a score of 451+ (minimum needed so far for an ITA, April draw) who hasn't worked for a day in the past 9 years (but still satisfies the 1 year continuous NOC 0/A/B requirement in the last 10 years) but has their application perfect in all other respects including POF derived from funds that can be conclusively established to be unencumbered. Under their existing regulations, CIC cannot refuse this applicant on the grounds of not having held a job for a while or not having paid taxes or not having savings left over from their post tax income. Very exaggerated example but I wanted to make that point clear that it isn't CIC's place to question proof of skilled employment income.
Does a "NOTARIZED WHITE PAPER" suffice the need to prove that it is real? IF SO then would it give enough strength to the POF that the last 6 months statement of the principal applicant be overlooked?