+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
mehuna said:
:) :) :) :) :) :) ;D

GOOD NEWS TO SHARE..............
Just seen ""We started processing your application on February 5, 2015"". 2ND LINE UPDATED ON MY ECAS.

Congrats dear :D :D :D
 
frmamun said:
I have updated my info in global SS but not getting any clue to update in SVO SS. Can anyone please help me?

30 DAYS PASSED BUT DID NOT GET YET AOR
 
mcgyver said:
Niv sister, I am happy to know you received your gcms notes. Notice the word "provisionally". While I cannot say "it WILL BE", I nevertheless strongly feel about suggesting you to bring it up softly with whoever gave you your reference letter and tell that person that he/she may be visited/contacted by CIC representatives. Prepare yourself too, just in case they decide to visit/contact you. These are precautionary measures you can take to better equip yourself for the undesired possibility. Some ppl may ask you not to worry at all. But I say, "Worry a bit to the extent which drives you to prepare yourself just for a possible visit." Don't you think that is much better than feeling complacent and getting taken by surprise? I applied the above suggestions on myself when we came to know that some ppl started having visitors at their offices, even though there was no phrase/word in my gcms notes hinting that a visit could be imminent in near future. All I say is that taking actions of precaution does not hurt.

Thanks Bhaiya.. Yes i am preparing for that. But it would be easy if we know the exact time.. Everything is so unpredictable... ??? Lets see what happen next.. Just pray for each other. And if any update plz share with us.
 
Robinson Road, P O Box 845
901645 Singapore

Isn't this the address to send documents? It was on top of the letter sent to me.
My Tracking ID is showing cannot be delivered to p o box.
the next line says address discrepancy resolved

What should i understand from this???? ??? ??? ???
Can anyone let me know the correct address to send documents?
 
Dear Seniors,
I have applied for FSWP-14 by myself NOC-1114 on 12 may 2014.

On 12 Nov-14 got a letter form VO where they asked me for clarification why my previous experience were similar. I was replied on 25th Nov with a fresh experience letter from both organization.

Surprisingly I have got refusal letter yesterday , where they said I did false representation.

But I have provided all guanine exp letter ,which I got from my employer.


* Shall I apply for a judicial review.
* Or any other option for me.
Looking forward to hear from you.
 
Suny said:
Dear Seniors,
I have applied for FSWP-14 by myself NOC-1114 on 12 may 2014.

On 12 Nov-14 got a letter form VO where they asked me for clarification why my previous experience were similar. I was replied on 25th Nov with a fresh experience letter from both organization.

Surprisingly I have got refusal letter yesterday , where they said I did false representation.

But I have provided all guanine exp letter ,which I got from my employer.


* Shall I apply for a judicial review.
* Or any other option for me.
Looking forward to hear from you.

What did you mean by " previous experience" did you take same type of reference letter from current and previous company?
 
afsun1105 said:
Robinson Road, P O Box 845
901645 Singapore

Isn't this the address to send documents? It was on top of the letter sent to me.
My Tracking ID is showing cannot be delivered to p o box.
the next line says address discrepancy resolved

What should i understand from this???? ??? ??? ???
Can anyone let me know the correct address to send documents?

Courier can't deliver to PO boxes. The correct address discussed many time in the forum.
But no need to worry looks like the courier found a workaround.
 
zstream said:
Courier can't deliver to PO boxes. The correct address discussed many time in the forum.
But no need to worry looks like the courier found a workaround.

Thanks...But in the letter it was said to use the given address.
 
Maverick.Canajun said:
Congrats mehuna! Ricky, mehuna is in sgvo SS, 7/3 applied NOC 1112, per10/28, AOR 12/8, 2nd line 2/5
Thanks Bro, can you help me update the information in the profile ???
 
SGVO DATABASE - AT A GLANCE

Shorted out by visa issued.
It looks NOC-2281 is hot for visa issue compare to 2171 applied highest numbers. Also there is no visa issued for 2173 compare to 2174 by the same number of applicants have received 3 visas.

Good average on 1111 as 2 applicants received visa out of 7 applicants.. :) :) :)


NOCApplicantVISAPPRMDAORPERREJ
2281
16​
4--561
2133
28​
321166-
2174
20​
3-368-
1112
19​
3-178-
2171
32​
2311511-
1123
16​
2-3731
0111
13​
21-73-
2132
9​
2--25-
1111
7​
2--41-
0112
11​
1--46-
2241
8​
11-33-
0911
7​
1--33-
0113
5​
1--31-
1212
1​
1-----
2173
20​
-21125-
4011
16​
-1159-
2172
6​
--132-
1114
4​
---3-1
3112
4​
---13-
0712
2​
---11-
2131
2​
---2--
0013
2​
----2-
0311
2​
---2--
2263
1​
----1-
3012
1​
----1-
3216
1​
---1--
4151
1​
---1-
0015
1​
---1--
0121
1​
---1--
0711
1​
----1-
Total257281012114903

Have a good day ;D ;D ;D
 
Thanks all for the best wishes on my ECAS status change and pls. keep me in your prayers.

Wish you all the very best in your endeavors.
 
Shamrajjo said:
SGVO DATABASE - AT A GLANCE

Shorted out by visa issued.
It looks NOC-2281 is hot for visa issue compare to 2171 applied highest numbers. Also there is no visa issued for 2173 compare to 2174 by the same number of applicants have received 3 visas.

Good average on 1111 as 2 applicants received visa out of 7 applicants.. :) :) :)


NOCApplicantVISAPPRMDAORPERREJ
2281
16​
4--561
2133
28​
321166-
2174
20​
3-368-
1112
19​
3-178-
2171
32​
2311511-
1123
16​
2-3731
0111
13​
21-73-
2132
9​
2--25-
1111
7​
2--41-
0112
11​
1--46-
2241
8​
11-33-
0911
7​
1--33-
0113
5​
1--31-
1212
1​
1-----
2173
20​
-21125-
4011
16​
-1159-
2172
6​
--132-
1114
4​
---3-1
3112
4​
---13-
0712
2​
---11-
2131
2​
---2--
0013
2​
----2-
0311
2​
---2--
2263
1​
----1-
3012
1​
----1-
3216
1​
---1--
4151
1​
---1-
0015
1​
---1--
0121
1​
---1--
0711
1​
----1-
Total257281012114903

Have a good day ;D ;D ;D

Good Job.. :)
 
zstream said:
What did you mean by " previous experience" did you take same type of reference letter from current and previous company?

I think it was same job description in both company reason it was suspicious from VO. Usually every company should some different job responsibilities but if anyone has put same in both company letterhead means it just copy and paste procedure and singed by seniors or HR.
 
Shamrajjo said:
SGVO DATABASE - AT A GLANCE

Shorted out by visa issued.
It looks NOC-2281 is hot for visa issue compare to 2171 applied highest numbers. Also there is no visa issued for 2173 compare to 2174 by the same number of applicants have received 3 visas.

Good average on 1111 as 2 applicants received visa out of 7 applicants.. :) :) :)
Have a good day ;D ;D ;D
Thanks for sharing useful info
 
Shamrajjo said:
SGVO DATABASE - AT A GLANCE

Shorted out by visa issued.
It looks NOC-2281 is hot for visa issue compare to 2171 applied highest numbers. Also there is no visa issued for 2173 compare to 2174 by the same number of applicants have received 3 visas.

Good average on 1111 as 2 applicants received visa out of 7 applicants.. :) :) :)


NOCApplicantVISAPPRMDAORPERREJ
2281
16​
4--561
2133
28​
321166-
2174
20​
3-368-
1112
19​
3-178-
2171
32​
2311511-
1123
16​
2-3731
0111
13​
21-73-
2132
9​
2--25-
1111
7​
2--41-
0112
11​
1--46-
2241
8​
11-33-
0911
7​
1--33-
0113
5​
1--31-
1212
1​
1-----
2173
20​
-21125-
4011
16​
-1159-
2172
6​
--132-
1114
4​
---3-1
3112
4​
---13-
0712
2​
---11-
2131
2​
---2--
0013
2​
----2-
0311
2​
---2--
2263
1​
----1-
3012
1​
----1-
3216
1​
---1--
4151
1​
---1-
0015
1​
---1--
0121
1​
---1--
0711
1​
----1-
Total257281012114903

Have a good day ;D ;D ;D

useful info brother. +1 for your analysis.