FSW 2014 SINGAPORE VISA OFFICE - LET'S CONNECT HERE

[smaz123]

Hello, can you share your timeline?

NOC:4011
PER:23 dec 2014
AOR: 22 jan 2014
MR:31 Mar 2015
3rd line: 7 Apr 2015
4th line: 5 May 2015
But no ppr yet. Is that ok?

 

[smaz123]

Big Congratulations bro

Thanks bro. Best of luck to u too.

 

[Maverick.Canajun]

Hello all,

I have the problem.
I'm principal applicant with my dependant child. My spouse is not accompanying with me because of the personnal problem. But he is also required to undergo the medical examination.
I want to know if it would be influenced on my application if the health of my spouse is not met to medical requirements???
Thanks for yours reponses.

A couple of answers needed:
1. Spouse is in your original application? If not, did they ask for any documentation on why not accompanying? If yes, anything provided so far?
2. All that I need to ascertain is in Point 1. If you choose not to answer, please draw your own conclusions from the below text:

IRPR rule 23 is clear that non-accompanying family members of prospective immigrants must be examined unless if

- they are the principal applicant’s spouse, and the relationship has broken down in law or in fact; and
- they are the principal applicant’s child, unless the principal applicant does not have custody of the child or is not empowered to act on behalf of the child by virtue of a court order or by written agreement or by operation of law.

In recognition of the fact that there will be circumstances where the above does not apply, but where a principal applicant genuinely cannot compel a non-accompanying family member to be examined, CIC’s Inland Processing Manual (the “Manual”) states:

The applicant should be advised that they will lose this right should their family members not be examined.

If family members are genuinely unavailable or unwilling to be examined, the consequences of not having them examined should be clearly explained to the applicant and noted on the record. Officers may wish to have applicants sign a statutory declaration indicating that they understand the consequences of not having a family member examined.

Officers should be open to the possibility that a client may not be able to make a family member available for examination. If an applicant has done everything in their power to have their family member examined but has failed to do so, and the officer is satisfied that the applicant is aware of the consequences of this (i.e., no future sponsorship possible), then a refusal of their application for non-compliance would not be appropriate.

Officers must decide on a case-by-case basis, using common sense and good judgment, whether to proceed with an application even if all family members have not been examined. Some scenarios where this may likely occur include where an ex-spouse refuses to allow a child to be examined or an overage dependent refuses to be examined. Proceeding in this way should be a last resort and only after the officer is convinced that the applicant cannot make the family member available for examination. The applicant themselves cannot choose not to have a family member examined.

 

[Anhhuy]

A couple of answers needed:
1. Spouse is in your original application? If not, did they ask for any documentation on why not accompanying? If yes, anything provided so far?
2. All that I need to ascertain is in Point 1. If you choose not to answer, please draw your own conclusions from the below text:

IRPR rule 23 is clear that non-accompanying family members of prospective immigrants must be examined unless if

- they are the principal applicant's spouse, and the relationship has broken down in law or in fact; and
- they are the principal applicant's child, unless the principal applicant does not have custody of the child or is not empowered to act on behalf of the child by virtue of a court order or by written agreement or by operation of law.

In recognition of the fact that there will be circumstances where the above does not apply, but where a principal applicant genuinely cannot compel a non-accompanying family member to be examined, CIC's Inland Processing Manual (the “Manual”) states:

The applicant should be advised that they will lose this right should their family members not be examined.

If family members are genuinely unavailable or unwilling to be examined, the consequences of not having them examined should be clearly explained to the applicant and noted on the record. Officers may wish to have applicants sign a statutory declaration indicating that they understand the consequences of not having a family member examined.

Officers should be open to the possibility that a client may not be able to make a family member available for examination. If an applicant has done everything in their power to have their family member examined but has failed to do so, and the officer is satisfied that the applicant is aware of the consequences of this (i.e., no future sponsorship possible), then a refusal of their application for non-compliance would not be appropriate.

Officers must decide on a case-by-case basis, using common sense and good judgment, whether to proceed with an application even if all family members have not been examined. Some scenarios where this may likely occur include where an ex-spouse refuses to allow a child to be examined or an overage dependent refuses to be examined. Proceeding in this way should be a last resort and only after the officer is convinced that the applicant cannot make the family member available for examination. The applicant themselves cannot choose not to have a family member examined.

Thank you for reply very concretely.
Answer 1: My spouse is not in my application because we have been separated for 3 years. I declared this in my application. Then VO required me to submit a legal approuve of separation but unfortunately i don't have it because in my country there's only the legal approuve of divorce. In plus i noted to them that my spouse has never had intention to immigrate. And today i have just received the email from SVO that required my spouse to go medical examination. The problem which i'm worried of is that my spouse's health maybe don't meet medical requirement and it'll influence on my app.
I don't understand Why the medical problem of one family member non accompanying has influence on other members in the application???

 

[Shamrajjo]

Thank you for reply very concretely.
Answer 1: My spouse is not in my application because we have been separated for 3 years. I declared this in my application. Then VO required me to submit a legal approuve of separation but unfortunately i don't have it because in my country there's only the legal approuve of divorce. In plus i noted to them that my spouse has never had intention to immigrate. And today i have just received the email from SVO that required my spouse to go medical examination. The problem which i'm worried of is that my spouse's health maybe don't meet medical requirement and it'll influence on my app.
I don't understand Why the medical problem of one family member non accompanying has influence on other members in the application???

Only VO concern is that your kids biological parents, may be in future your spouse may intend to visit CA to see your kids reason VO is asking to do medical of your spouse as well...

 

[pace_s]

hello everyone! just want to join in this thread. it has been almost 2 months since 2nd line in ecas. praying really hard that MR will come soon for all of us.

 

[nightbuzzard007]

how many of us who is waiting for dm/ppr after 3rd line update since march?
*my 3rd line 21 march

 

[Anubis]

dear expert members

will u pls tell me how i can change my email address for future correspondence which i sent with my app package.
my consultant is not letting me see the mails.
i have my UCI no.
As my ecas status showing IN PROCESS

Below is the explanation that is available in online file status check website

 

[desertfox]

dear expert members

will u pls tell me how i can change my email address for future correspondence which i sent with my app package.
my consultant is not letting me see the mails.
i have my UCI no.
As my ecas status showing IN PROCESS

Below is the explanation that is available in online file status check website

Raise a case specific enquiry with your visa Office and request them to update the email address.
https://secure.cic.gc.ca/enquiries-renseignements/case-cas-eng.aspx?mission=singapore

 

[kazioahid]

Hi Seniors

If Ecas shows 4th line . Can we utilize our FD . Still not receiving PPR. Thanks

 

[fespenido]

Did anyone received passport back in the past week from SGVO?

 

[zstream]

Did anyone received passport back in the past week from SGVO?

According to global ss richen and tun got their visa.

 

[muradhs]

According to global ss richen and tun got their visa.

zstream bro any update ? In response to a CSE, they said my file is queued for review.

 

[zstream]

zstream bro any update ? In response to a CSE, they said my file is queued for review.

No update yet.

 

[Mushfiq_1987]

Just received my first GCMS this morning... They have allotted me 70 points. My self calculated points was 75 but they didn't count 5 points (uncle) in adaptability. Couldn't find any reason for that reduction. Anyway details are below: (my questions are in green)

SENIORS please comment:

Date generated: 2015-04-07

ASSESSMENTS
Eligibility: In Progress
Security: Not Started
HIRV:
Criminality: Passed
Org Crime:
Medical: Not Started
Misrepresentation:
Other reqs:
Final:

APPLICATION ASSIGNMENT
Due Date: 2015/02/28

On the first page I found --- Updated Date: 2015/03/19 (Is this the last time they opened my file?)

EVENTS 0

NOTES
NOTES: 1
Created Date: 2015/03/19 23:13:11
Created By:
Updated Date: 2015/03/19 23:13:11
Updated By:
Restricted: No
Label: General
Office: Singapore
Text: (Nothing here, no text, is this normal or there was something but they don't want me to see?)

NOTES: 2
Created Date: 2015/01/28 23:24:05
Created By:
Updated Date: 2015/01/28 23:24:05
Updated By:
Restricted: No
Label: Eligibility
Office: Singapore
Text: File reviewed. FOSS for PA and spouse— no hits. FSW category 2281 Computer network technicians PA and spouse married ddmmyyyy; marriage cert provided — Nikah nama not provided. Education — met Experience —satisfied with letter of reference and that PA meets work experience as required. Funds — PA has provided documentation for funds for fixed deposit of BDT xxxxxxxx. ($xxxxx. CAD). He has also provided bank letter with xxxxxxx FDR.

— Bangladesh — no concerns Police cert
Eligibility passed.

Here says Eligibility passed dated 2015/01/28 but in the beginning says last update 2015/03/19 where Eligibility is In Progress. :-X