There is nothing one can do about it...People nearby Canada or in USA are at a greater advantage and cap update also reflects that.JohnnyZee said:1112 needs to slow down pls..........................................
There is nothing one can do about it...People nearby Canada or in USA are at a greater advantage and cap update also reflects that.JohnnyZee said:1112 needs to slow down pls..........................................
I hope pharmacistfarhan is part of this cap update...that would mean this count is as of May 8th...here is me trying to think positively...Freebird_76 said:They change the date of modification finally to the current date!
But according to our forum and only 2 recharged applicants here, what these numbers mean to us?!! only 2 of this forum are included there?!!!
jigzyy said:
a) It could mean they got a huge influx on the first day, and very few of us made it in within the capFreebird_76 said:They change the date of modification finally to the current date!
But according to our forum and only 2 recharged applicants here, what these numbers mean to us?!! only 2 of this forum are included there?!!!
Correction, 2147 was 5, now 7. Keep an eye on Spreadsheet's CIC Status Updates Sheet.jig nesh said:1112 - 28
2147 - still 7
2174 - 15
Hopefully jigzyy...but to be fair, different NOCs could be as of different dates and hence they have left the date in the footer to May 4...jigzyy said:Looks like they have updated till May 8th [Partial], because we have 1 applicant whose CC got charged of 2131.
Quite possible. It's really strange that we don't have any 2174 applicant here that got charged which is quiet alarmingJohnnyZee said:Hopefully jigzyy...but to be fair, different NOCs could be as of different dates and hence they have left the date in the footer to May 4...
Yes, it is alarming though I would have thought they need specialists for each NOC to evaluate the job descriptions etc. This makes me think the 1112 is super active while for other NOCs may have fallen asleep!jigzyy said:Quite possible. It's really strange that we don't have any 2174 applicant here that got charged which is quiet alarming
We also do not have any 1112 in our spreadsheet that got charged...isn't that even worse given we are at 28 now?jigzyy said:Quite possible. It's really strange that we don't have any 2174 applicant here that got charged which is quiet alarming
I wonder whether these numbers are realistic enough? Only 2 out of 65 in this forum.....Where r those people who got charged?jigzyy said:Quite possible. It's really strange that we don't have any 2174 applicant here that got charged which is quiet alarming
Some of them may be DDs hence we don't know about charge...amit80203 said:I wonder whether these numbers are realistic enough? Only 2 out of 65 in this forum.....Where r those people who got charged?
aaah.. I thought 1978 was 1112, :sJohnnyZee said:We also do not have any 1112 in our spreadsheet that got charged...isn't that even worse given we are at 28 now?
Jigzzy's r u maintaining the google spreadsheet? Strongly recommend u combine the two tab "CIC Caps" and "NOC stats".jigzyy said:
Huangxyqjy - just the man I was looking for. What is the update on the chinese forums?Huangxyqjy said:Jigzzy's r u maintaining the google spreadsheet? Strongly recommend u combine the two tab "CIC Caps" and "NOC stats".
Here is sample in 2011, See tab "NOC &Updates"! It is easier for ppl to see the trend!
https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/lv?hl=fil&key=0AgthpG06V9k3dGE0Mldod0ljWTZjR25HZkpydDZ3QXc&hl=fil&f=true&noheader=false&gid=3